Fountain v. Ramirez

Filing 23

ORDER OF DISMISSAL ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 20 Report and Recommendations. ORDERED that the petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is DENIED and the case is DISMISSED with prejudice. A certificate of appealability is DENIED. All other motions not previously ruled on are hereby DENIED. Signed by District Judge Richard A. Schell on 11/8/2018. (daj, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION TONY RAY FOUNTAIN, #01562085 § VS. § DIRECTOR, TDCJ-CID § CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:17cv246 ORDER OF DISMISSAL Petitioner Tony Ray Fountain, a prisoner confined in the Texas prison system, filed the abovestyled and numbered petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Christine A. Nowak, who issued a Report and Recommendation concluding that the petition should be denied. Petitioner has filed objections. The Report of the Magistrate Judge, which contains her proposed findings of fact and recommendations for the disposition of such action, has been presented for consideration, and having made a de novo review of the objections raised by Petitioner to the Report, the Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and Petitioner’s objections are without merit. Therefore the Court hereby adopts the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge as the findings and conclusions of the Court. It is accordingly ORDERED that the petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is DENIED and the case is DISMISSED with prejudice. A certificate of appealability is DENIED. All other motions not previously ruled on are hereby DENIED. . SIGNED this the 8th day of November, 2018. _______________________________ RICHARD A. SCHELL UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?