Bueno v. Enerson Law LLC
MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE for 5 Report and Recommendations. It is, therefore, ORDERED that Plaintiff's claims are DISMISSED for want of prosecution. All relief not previously granted is DENIED. The Clerk is directed to CLOSE this civil action. Signed by Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 9/14/2017. (baf, )
United States District Court
EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
ENERSON LAW LLC, ET AL.,
§ CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:17-CV-00251
§ (Judge Mazzant/Judge Johnson)
MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action,
this matter having been heretofore referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636.
On August 10, 2017, the Magistrate Judge issued an Order, cautioning that the Court would
recommend that this case be dismissed for want of prosecution if Plaintiff failed to file a status
report or otherwise act on or before August 24, 2017 (Dkt. #4). On August 28, 2017, the report of
the Magistrate Judge (Dkt. #5) was entered containing proposed findings of fact and
recommendations that Plaintiff Patricia Bueno’s case be dismissed for want of prosecution.
Plaintiff still has failed to act upon the Order.
Having received the report of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto
having been timely filed, the Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the
Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge’s report as the findings and
conclusions of the Court.
It is, therefore, ORDERED that Plaintiff’s claims are DISMISSED for want of
All relief not previously granted is DENIED. The Clerk is directed to CLOSE this civil
IT IS SO ORDERED.
SIGNED this 14th day of September, 2017.
AMOS L. MAZZANT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?