Liu v. Flowers Davis, PLLC et al

Filing 28

MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE for 9 Report and Recommendations. It is, therefore, ORDERED that Plaintiff's claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, and the Clerk is directed to close this case. All relief not previously granted is hereby denied. Signed by Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 7/11/2017. (baf, )

Download PDF
United States District Court EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION HAO LIU, § § § § § § § § § Plaintiff, v. FLOWERS DAVIS, PLLC, et al, Defendants. CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:17-CV-263 MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On May 9, 2017, the report of the Magistrate Judge (Dkt. #9) was entered containing a recommendation that Plaintiff’s claims be dismissed without prejudice in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to comply with a Pre-Filing Injunction. See Liu v. Medical Center of Plano et al., 409-CV-625 (E.D. Tex. Oct 26, 2010). Having received the report of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto having been timely filed, this Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge’s report as the findings and conclusions of the Court. . It is, therefore, ORDERED that Plaintiff’s claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, and the Clerk is directed to close this case. All relief not previously granted is hereby denied. IT IS SO ORDERED. SIGNED this 11th day of July, 2017. ___________________________________ AMOS L. MAZZANT UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?