Liu v. Flowers Davis, PLLC et al
Filing
38
MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE for 36 Report and Recommendations. Accordingly, both Motions (Dkts. #32; #33) are DENIED. Signed by District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 5/22/2018. (daj, )
United States District Court
EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
SHERMAN DIVISION
HAO LIU,
Plaintiff,
v.
FLOWERS DAVIS, PLLC, et al,
Defendants.
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:17-CV-263
MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action,
this matter having been heretofore referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636.
On March 16, 2018, the report of the Magistrate Judge (Dkt. #36) was entered containing proposed
findings of fact and recommendations that pro se Plaintiff Hao Liu’s (“Plaintiff”) “United States
Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Complaint based on its Judicial Notice” (Dkt. #32) and
“United States Motion for Extension of Time to File Supplement Complaint based on Corrupt
Public Tax Records” (Dkt. #33) (collectively, the “Motions”) be denied. Both Motions appear to
seek leave to file an amended complaint. See Dkt. #36.
On May 9, 2018, the report of the Magistrate Judge, sent to Plaintiff on March 19, 2018, at
his address of record via certified mail, return receipt requested, was returned to the Court as
undeliverable. See Dkt. #37. The Court notes it is Plaintiff’s responsibility to keep the Court
informed of his current address.
Having received the report of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto
having been timely filed, the Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the
.
Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge’s report as the findings and
conclusions of the Court.
Accordingly, both Motions (Dkts. #32; #33) are DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
SIGNED this 22nd day of May, 2018.
___________________________________
AMOS L. MAZZANT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?