City of Plano et al v. Naghila et al
Filing
20
MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE for 18 Report and Recommendations, 8 Motion to Remand to State Court filed by City of Plano. It is ORDERED that Plaintiff City of Planos Motion to Remand is GRANTED, and this case is hereby REMANDED to the City of Plano Municipal Court for further proceedings. All relief not previously granted is DENIED. Signed by Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 10/17/2017. (rpc, )
United States District Court
EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
SHERMAN DIVISION
CITY OF PLANO, CITY OF PLANO
MUNICIPAL COURT, STATE OF TEXAS,
TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC
SAFETY, CITY OF PLANO POLICE
DEPARTMENT
v.
LAELA NAGHELA-EL
§
§ CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:17-CV-384
§ (Judge Mazzant/Judge Nowak)
§
§
§
§
§
MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action,
this matter having been heretofore referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636.
On September 13, 2017, the report of the Magistrate Judge (Dkt. #18) was entered containing
proposed findings of fact and recommendations that Plaintiff City of Plano’s Motion to Remand
(Dkt. #8) be GRANTED.
Having received the report of the Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto having been
timely filed, the Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge
are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge’s report as the findings and conclusions of the Court.
It is, therefore, ORDERED that Plaintiff City of Plano’s Motion to Remand is
.
GRANTED, and this case is hereby REMANDED to the City of Plano Municipal Court for
further proceedings.
All relief not previously granted is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
SIGNED this 17th day of October, 2017.
___________________________________
AMOS L. MAZZANT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?