McDuff v. USA

Filing 29

ORDER OF DISMISSAL adopting 19 Report and Recommendation. It is accordingly ORDERED that the motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence is DENIED and Movant's case is DISMISSED with prejudice. A certificate of appealability is DENIED. Finally, it is ORDERED that all motions not previously ruled on are hereby DENIED. Signed by District Judge Richard A. Schell on 11/22/2020. (daj, )

Download PDF
Case 4:17-cv-00391-RAS-KPJ Document 29 Filed 11/22/20 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 952 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION GARY LYNN MCDUFF, #59934-079 VS. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA § § § § § CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:17cv391 CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 4:09cr90(2) ORDER OF DISMISSAL The above-entitled and numbered civil action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Kimberly C. Priest Johnson who issued a Report and Recommendation concluding that the motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence should be denied and dismissed with prejudice. Movant has filed objections. The Report of the Magistrate Judge, which contains proposed findings of fact and recommendations for the disposition of such action, has been presented for consideration. Having made a de novo review of the objections raised by Movant to the Report, the court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the same as the findings and conclusions of the court. It is accordingly ORDERED that the motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence is DENIED and Movant’s case is DISMISSED with prejudice. A certificate of appealability is DENIED. Finally, it is ORDERED that all motions not previously ruled on are hereby DENIED. . SIGNED this the 22nd day of November, 2020. _______________________________ RICHARD A. SCHELL UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?