Azar & Associates, P.C. v. Bryant et al

Filing 243

MEMORANDUM ADOPTING 228 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE. Therefore, the Agreed Motion (Dkt. # 226 ) is GRANTED. Azar's claims against McNeil Consultants, LLC are hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 4/22/2019. (rpc, )

Download PDF
United States District Court EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION FRANKLIN D. AZAR & ASSOCIATES, P.C., Plaintiff, v. JERRY L. BRYANT, et al., Defendants. § § § § § § § § § § § § ACTION NO. 4:17-CV-418 JUDGE MAZZANT/JUDGE JOHNSON MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On March 29, 2019, the Magistrate Judge entered proposed findings of fact and recommendations (Dkt. #228) that Plaintiff Franklin D. Azar & Associates, P.C. (“Azar”) and Defendant McNeil Consultants, LLC's1 Agreed Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Claims Against Defendant McNeil Consultants, LLC (the “Agreed Motion”) (Dkt. #226) be GRANTED. Having received the Report of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto having been timely filed, the Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge’s report as the findings and conclusions of the Court. Therefore, the Agreed Motion (Dkt. #226) is GRANTED. Azar’s claims against McNeil Consultants, LLC are hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. IT IS SO ORDERED. 1 McNeil Consultants, LLC is also named in its d/b/a form as Quintessa Marketing. See Dkt. 226 at 1. SIGNED this 22nd day of April, 2019. ___________________________________ AMOS L. MAZZANT UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?