Crim v. Hartford Fire Insurance Company
MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE for 45 Report and Recommendations re 44 Stipulation of Dismissal filed by Hartford Fire Insurance Company. The entire action, and all of the claims asserted therein is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Each party shall bear its own costs. All relief not previously granted is hereby DENIED. Signed by District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 12/5/2017. (cm, )
United States District Court
EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
BARBARA CRIM d/b/a MARKEY
HARTFORD LLOYD’S INSURANCE
CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:17-CV-428
JUDGE MAZZANT/JUDGE JOHNSON
MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action,
this matter having been heretofore referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636.
On November 15, 2017, the report of the Magistrate Judge (Dkt. #45) was entered containing
proposed findings of fact and recommendations that the parties’ Joint Stipulation of Dismissal with
Prejudice (Dkt. #44) should be GRANTED.
Having received the report of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto
having been timely filed, the Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the
Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge's report as the findings and
conclusions of the Court. Therefore, the parties’ Joint Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice
(Dkt. #44) is GRANTED.
Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that this entire
action, and all of the claims asserted therein, be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Each party
shall bear its own costs.
All relief not previously granted is hereby DENIED, and the Clerk is directed to CLOSE
this civil action.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
SIGNED this 5th day of December, 2017.
AMOS L. MAZZANT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?