Henderson V Commissioner, SSA

Filing 37

MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE for 36 Report and Recommendation. It is, therefore, ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Attorney's Fees under 406(b) of the Social Security Act (Dkt. # 29 ) is GRANTED. Signed by District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 12/3/2019. (daj, )

Download PDF
United States District Court EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION TONY HENDERSON § § § § § v. COMMISSIONER, SSA Civil Action No. 4:17-CV-448 (Judge Mazzant/Judge Nowak) MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On October 28, 2019, the report of the Magistrate Judge (Dkt. #36) was entered, containing proposed findings of fact and recommendations that Plaintiff’s Motion for Attorney’s Fees under 406(b) of the Social Security Act (Dkt. #29) be granted. Having received the report of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto having been timely filed, the Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge’s report as the findings and conclusions of the Court. It is, therefore, ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Attorney’s Fees under 406(b) of the . Social Security Act (Dkt. #29) is GRANTED. Plaintiff’s attorney is awarded a fee in the amount $29,982.13, to be paid out of Plaintiff’s past due benefits being withheld by the Commissioner for attorney fees. Upon receipt of such payment, Plaintiff’s attorney shall refund to Plaintiff the EAJA award previously granted in this cause. SIGNED this 3rd day of December, 2019. ___________________________________ AMOS L. MAZZANT UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?