Henderson V Commissioner, SSA
Filing
37
MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE for 36 Report and Recommendation. It is, therefore, ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Attorney's Fees under 406(b) of the Social Security Act (Dkt. # 29 ) is GRANTED. Signed by District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 12/3/2019. (daj, )
United States District Court
EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
SHERMAN DIVISION
TONY HENDERSON
§
§
§
§
§
v.
COMMISSIONER, SSA
Civil Action No. 4:17-CV-448
(Judge Mazzant/Judge Nowak)
MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action,
this matter having been heretofore referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636.
On October 28, 2019, the report of the Magistrate Judge (Dkt. #36) was entered, containing
proposed findings of fact and recommendations that Plaintiff’s Motion for Attorney’s Fees under
406(b) of the Social Security Act (Dkt. #29) be granted.
Having received the report of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto
having been timely filed, the Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the
Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge’s report as the findings and
conclusions of the Court.
It is, therefore, ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Attorney’s Fees under 406(b) of the
.
Social Security Act (Dkt. #29) is GRANTED. Plaintiff’s attorney is awarded a fee in the amount
$29,982.13, to be paid out of Plaintiff’s past due benefits being withheld by the Commissioner for
attorney fees. Upon receipt of such payment, Plaintiff’s attorney shall refund to Plaintiff the EAJA
award previously granted in this cause.
SIGNED this 3rd day of December, 2019.
___________________________________
AMOS L. MAZZANT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?