Johnson v. City of Denton
Filing
13
MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE for 11 Report and Recommendations. It is, therefore, ORDERED that Plaintiff Ena R. Johnsons claims against Defendants City of Denton, DIRECTV, and Dish Network are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. All relief not previously granted is DENIED. The Clerk is directed to CLOSE this civil action. Signed by District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 5/31/2018. (daj, )
United States District Court
EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
SHERMAN DIVISION
ENA R. JOHNSON
§
§
§
§
v.
CITY OF DENTON, ET AL.
Civil Action No. 4:17-CV-476
(Judge Mazzant/Judge Nowak)
MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action,
this matter having been heretofore referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636.
On May 1, 2018, the report of the Magistrate Judge (Dkt. #11) was entered containing proposed
findings of fact and recommendations that Plaintiff Ena R. Johnson’s claims against Defendants
City of Denton, DIRECTV, and Dish Network be dismissed.
On May 7, 2018, Plaintiff
acknowledged receipt of the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Dkt. #12).
Having received the report of the Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto having been
timely filed, the Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge
are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge’s report as the findings and conclusions of the Court.
It is, therefore, ORDERED that Plaintiff Ena R. Johnson’s claims against Defendants City
.
of Denton, DIRECTV, and Dish Network are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
All relief not previously granted is DENIED.
The Clerk is directed to CLOSE this civil action.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
SIGNED this 31st day of May, 2018.
___________________________________
AMOS L. MAZZANT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?