Mills v. USA

Filing 6

ORDER OF DISMISSAL ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 3 Report and Recommendations. ORDERED that the Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence by a Person in Federal Custody (#2) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is DISMISSED without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction. A certificate of appealability is DENIED. All motions by either party not previously ruled upon are DENIED. Signed by Judge Marcia A. Crone on 8/14/2017. (daj, )

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT GEARY MOHAMMED MILLS, #16878-078 § § versus § § UNITED STATES OF AMERICA § EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:17-CV-510 CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 4:10-CR-65(08) ORDER OF DISMISSAL The above-entitled and numbered civil action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Christine A. Nowak, who issued a Report and Recommendation concluding that Movant’s Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct a Sentence by a Person in Federal Custody pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 should be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Movant has filed objections. The Report of the Magistrate Judge, which contains proposed findings of fact and recommendations for the disposition of such action, has been presented for consideration. Having made a de novo review of the objections raised by Movant to the Report, the Court concludes that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and the objections of Movant are without merit. It is accordingly ORDERED that the Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence by a Person in Federal Custody (#2) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is DISMISSED without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction. A certificate of appealability is DENIED. All motions by either party not previously ruled upon are DENIED. . SIGNED at Beaumont, Texas, this 7th day of September, 2004. SIGNED at Beaumont, Texas, this 14th day of August, 2017. ________________________________________ MARCIA A. CRONE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?