Jones v. ProCollect, Inc.

Filing 11

MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 10 . ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that this entire action, and all of the claims asserted therein, be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Each party shall bear its own costs. All relief not previously granted is hereby DENIED, and the Clerk is directed to CLOSE this civil action. Signed by District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 12/11/2017. (rpc, )

Download PDF
United States District Court EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION JUSTIN JONES, Plaintiff, v. PRO COLLECT, INC., Defendant. § § § § § § § § § Civil Action No. 4:17-cv-541 (Judge Mazzant/Judge Johnson) MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On November 21, 2017, the report of the Magistrate Judge (Dkt. #10) was entered containing proposed findings of fact and recommendations that this case should be dismissed in its entirety with prejudice pursuant to Plaintiff Justin Jones and Defendant ProCollect, Inc.’s Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice (Dkt. #9). Having received the report of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto having been timely filed, the Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge's report as the findings and conclusions of the Court. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that this entire action, and all of the claims asserted therein, be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Each party shall bear its own costs. . All relief not previously granted is hereby DENIED, and the Clerk is directed to CLOSE this civil action. IT IS SO ORDERED. SIGNED this 11th day of December, 2017. ___________________________________ AMOS L. MAZZANT UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?