Muro v. HDR Trucking, Inc. et al

Filing 12

MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE for 9 Motion to Remand to State Court filed by Francisco Muro, 11 Report and Recommendations. It is, therefore, ORDERED that Plaintiff Francisco Muro's Unop posed Motion to Remand (Dkt. 9 ) is GRANTED, and this case is hereby REMANDED to the 62nd Judicial District Court, Hopkins County, Texas for further proceedings. All relief not previously granted is DENIED. Signed by Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 9/12/2017. (baf, )

Download PDF
United States District Court EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION FRANCISCO MURO v. HDR TRUCKING INC., DAVID HORAN § § § § § Civil Action No. 4:17-CV-571 (Judge Mazzant/Judge Nowak) MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On August 24, 2017, the report of the Magistrate Judge (Dkt. #11) was entered containing proposed findings of fact and recommendations that Plaintiff Francisco Muro’s Unopposed Motion to Remand (Dkt. #9) be granted. Having received the report of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto having been timely filed, this Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge’s report as the findings and conclusions of the Court. It is, therefore, ORDERED that Plaintiff Francisco Muro’s Unopposed Motion to Remand . (Dkt. #9) is GRANTED, and this case is hereby REMANDED to the 62nd Judicial District Court, Hopkins County, Texas for further proceedings. All relief not previously granted is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. SIGNED this 12th day of September, 2017. ___________________________________ AMOS L. MAZZANT UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?