Masters v. Bank of America, National Association
Filing
15
MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 14 . The parties' Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice (Dkt. # 13 ) is GRANTED. All relief not previously granted is hereby DENIED. Signed by District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 3/4/2018. (rpc, )
United States District Court
EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
SHERMAN DIVISION
TAMMY MASTERS,
Plaintiff,
v.
BANK OF AMERICA, NATIONAL
ASSOCIATION d/b/a BANK OF
AMERICA,
Defendant.
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:17-CV-688
JUDGE MAZZANT/JUDGE JOHNSON
MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action,
this matter having been heretofore referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636.
On March 1, 2018, the report of the Magistrate Judge (Dkt. #14)1 was entered containing proposed
findings of fact and recommendations that the parties’ Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice
(Dkt. #13) should be GRANTED.
Having received the report of the United States Magistrate Judge, the Court is of the
opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the
Magistrate Judge’s report as the findings and conclusions of the Court. Therefore, the parties’
Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice (Dkt. #13) is GRANTED.
Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that this entire
action, and all of the claims asserted therein, be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
1
The Court notes that the Magistrate Judge’s Report was inadvertently titled “Order.” See Dkt. 14.
.
All relief not previously granted is hereby DENIED, and the Clerk is directed to CLOSE
this civil action.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
SIGNED this 4th day of March, 2018.
___________________________________
AMOS L. MAZZANT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?