Masters v. Bank of America, National Association

Filing 15

MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 14 . The parties' Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice (Dkt. # 13 ) is GRANTED. All relief not previously granted is hereby DENIED. Signed by District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 3/4/2018. (rpc, )

Download PDF
United States District Court EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION TAMMY MASTERS, Plaintiff, v. BANK OF AMERICA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION d/b/a BANK OF AMERICA, Defendant. § § § § § § § § § § § § § CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:17-CV-688 JUDGE MAZZANT/JUDGE JOHNSON MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On March 1, 2018, the report of the Magistrate Judge (Dkt. #14)1 was entered containing proposed findings of fact and recommendations that the parties’ Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice (Dkt. #13) should be GRANTED. Having received the report of the United States Magistrate Judge, the Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge’s report as the findings and conclusions of the Court. Therefore, the parties’ Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice (Dkt. #13) is GRANTED. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that this entire action, and all of the claims asserted therein, be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 1 The Court notes that the Magistrate Judge’s Report was inadvertently titled “Order.” See Dkt. 14. . All relief not previously granted is hereby DENIED, and the Clerk is directed to CLOSE this civil action. IT IS SO ORDERED. SIGNED this 4th day of March, 2018. ___________________________________ AMOS L. MAZZANT UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?