Mayo v. USA
Filing
7
ORDER OF DISMISSAL ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 5 Report and Recommendations. ORDERED that Movant's Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence by a Person in Federal Custody (#1) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255, construe d as a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241, is DENIED, and the case is DISMISSED with prejudice. All motions by either party not previously ruled upon are DENIED. Signed by District Judge Marcia A. Crone on 4/2/2019. (daj, )
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
RODNEY DSHANE MAYO, #43959-177
versus
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
§
§
§
§
§
CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:17-CV-739
CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 4:11CR00248-008
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
The above-entitled and numbered civil action was referred to United States Magistrate
Judge Christine A. Nowak. The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, which
contains proposed findings of fact and recommendations for the disposition of such action, has
been presented for consideration, and no objections thereto having been timely filed, the Court is
of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and adopts
same as the findings and conclusions of the Court. It is accordingly
ORDERED that Movant’s Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence by a Person
in Federal Custody (#1) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255, construed as a petition for a writ of habeas
corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241, is DENIED, and the case is DISMISSED with prejudice.
All motions by either party not previously ruled upon are DENIED.
Signed this date
Apr 2, 2019
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?