Navarro v. Huffines Dodge Plano, L.P.
MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 17 . This entire action, and all of the claims asserted, or that could have been asserted therein, are hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Each party shall bear its own costs. All relief not previously granted is hereby DENIED. Signed by District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 2/13/2018. (rpc, )
United States District Court
EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
ANGEL NAVARRO, Individually and on Behalf
of All Those Similarly Situated,
HUFFINES DODGE PLANO, L.P.,
Case No. 4:17-CV-741-ALM-KPJ
MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action,
this matter having been heretofore referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636.
On January 22, 2018, the report of the Magistrate Judge (Dkt. #17) was entered containing
proposed findings of fact and recommendations that the parties’ Joint Motion to Dismiss and
Approve Settlement (the “Motion”) (Dkt. #15) should be GRANTED; the Settlement Agreement
attached thereto (Dkt. #15-1) should be APPROVED; and this case should be dismissed in its
entirety with prejudice.
Having received the report of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto
having been timely filed, the Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the
Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge’s report as the findings and
conclusions of the Court.
Plaintiffs filed this asserted collective action on October 16, 2017, alleging that Defendant
failed to pay Plaintiffs overtime hours for work in excess of forty (40) hours per week, or at the
minimum wage, in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq.
The Motion represents that Plaintiffs and Defendant have agreed to fully and finally settle this
matter based on the terms and conditions set forth in the Settlement Agreement. See Dkts. #15;
After review of a settlement between parties in FLSA collective actions, a court may
approve settlement and enter a stipulated judgment. Lynn’s Food Stores, Inc. v. U.S. By and
Through U.S. Dept. of Labor, Employment Standards Admin., Wage and Hour Div., 679 F.2d 1350
(11th Cir. 1982); see also Bodle V. TXL Mortg. Corp., 788 F.3d 159 (5th Cir. 2015). Having
reviewed the Settlement Agreement, the Court is satisfied that the Settlement Agreement
represents a reasonable compromise of the disputed claims in this action. Accordingly, the Motion
(Dkt. 15) is GRANTED, and the Settlement Agreement (Dkt. 15-1) is APPROVED.
Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that this entire
action, and all of the claims asserted, or that could have been asserted therein, are hereby
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Each party shall bear its own costs.
All relief not previously granted is hereby DENIED, and the Clerk is directed to CLOSE
this civil action.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
SIGNED this 13th day of February, 2018.
AMOS L. MAZZANT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?