Khyavi et al v. President and Fellows of Harvard College

Filing 28

MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE for 26 Report and Recommendations. It is, therefore, ORDERED that Plaintiffs' claims against Defendant are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. All relief not previously granted is DENIED. The Clerk is directed to CLOSE this civil action. Signed by District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 1/31/2018. (daj, )

Download PDF
United States District Court EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION MAHSA P. KHYAVI, ET AL. v. PRESIDENT AND FELLOWS OF HARVARD COLLEGE § § § § § § Civil Action No. 4:17-CV-760 (Judge Mazzant/Judge Nowak) MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On December 29, 2017, the report of the Magistrate Judge (Dkt. #26) was entered containing proposed findings of fact and recommendations that Plaintiffs Mahsa P. Khyavi and Parviz Pharmaceuticals and Health System’s claims be dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41, and that each of Plaintiffs’ claims against Defendant President and Fellows of Harvard College be dismissed without prejudice. Having received the report of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto having been timely filed, this Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge’s reports as the findings and conclusions of the Court. It is, therefore, ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ claims against Defendant are DISMISSED . WITHOUT PREJUDICE. All relief not previously granted is DENIED. The Clerk is directed to CLOSE this civil action. IT IS SO ORDERED. SIGNED this 31st day of January, 2018. ___________________________________ AMOS L. MAZZANT UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?