Cunningham v. CBC Conglomerate LLC et al
Filing
100
MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE for 79 Report and Recommendations. Defendants Bruce Phillip Hood, Carey George Howe, and Jay Singh are DISMISSED without prejudice. Signed by District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 2/5/2019. (daj, )
United States District Court
EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
SHERMAN DIVISION
CRAIG CUNNINGHAM
v.
CBC CONGLOMERATE, LLC, ET AL.
§
§
§
§
§
§
Civil Action No. 4:17-CV-793
(Judge Mazzant/Judge Nowak)
MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action,
this matter having been heretofore referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636.
On January 4, 2019, the report of the Magistrate Judge (Dkt. #79) was entered containing proposed
findings of fact and recommendations that Defendants Bruce Phillip Hood, Carey George Howe,
and Jay Singh’s Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction (Dkt. #53) be granted, and
Defendants Bruce Phillip Hood, Carey George Howe, and Jay Singh be dismissed from the lawsuit.
Having received the report of the Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto having been
timely filed, the Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge
are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge’s report as the findings and conclusions of the Court.
It is, therefore, ORDERED that Defendants Bruce Phillip Hood, Carey George Howe, and
. Jay Singh’s Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction (Dkt. #53) be GRANTED.
Specifically, Defendants Bruce Phillip Hood, Carey George Howe, and Jay Singh
are DISMISSED without prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
SIGNED this 5th day of February, 2019.
___________________________________
AMOS L. MAZZANT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?