Williams v. McDonough et al

Filing 119

MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE. Plaintiff's Objection (Dkt. # 117 ) is OVERRULED and the Magistrate Judge's Report is ADOPTED as the findings and conclusions of the Court. IT IS ORDERED that the Officers' Motion (Dkt. # 102 ) is GRANTED. Plaintiff's excessive force claims against the Officers are hereby dismissed with prejudice to being asserted again until the Heck conditions are met. Signed by District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 2/14/2022. (rpc, )

Download PDF
Case 4:17-cv-00811-ALM-KPJ Document 119 Filed 02/14/22 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 1166 United States District Court EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION MELVIN EARL WILLIAMS, JR., Plaintiff, v. APRIL DAWN MCDONOUGH, et al., Defendants. § § § § § § § § § § Civil Action No. 4:17-cv-811-ALM-KPJ MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Came on for consideration the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action (the “Report”) (Dkt. #113), this matter having been heretofore referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. The following Motion is pending before the Court: 1. Defendants April Dawn McDonough (“Officer McDonough”) and Malcolm McGuire’s (“Officer McGuire”) (collectively, “the Officers’”) First Motion for Summary Judgment (the Motion) (Dkt. #102). In the Report, the Magistrate Judge recommended that the Officers’ Motion (Dkt. #102) be granted. Plaintiff Melvin Earl Williams, Jr. (“Plaintiff”) then filed an Objection (Dkt. #117) to the Report. The Court has conducted a de novo review of the Objection and is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and the Objection is without merit as to the ultimate findings of the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s Objection (Dkt. #117) Case 4:17-cv-00811-ALM-KPJ Document 119 Filed 02/14/22 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 1167 is OVERRULED and the Magistrate Judge’s Report is ADOPTED as the findings and conclusions of the Court. IT IS ORDERED that the Officers’ Motion (Dkt. #102) is GRANTED. . Plaintiff’s excessive force claims against the Officers are hereby dismissed with prejudice to being asserted again until the Heck conditions are met. IT IS SO ORDERED. SIGNED this 14th day of February, 2022. ___________________________________ AMOS L. MAZZANT UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?