Liu v. City of Allen et al

Filing 12

MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE for 7 Report and Recommendations. ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File New Cause (Dkt. #1) is DENIED. All relief not previously granted is hereby DENIED. The Clerk is directed to CLOSE this civil action. Signed by District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 5/9/2018. (daj, )

United States District Court
EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
SHERMAN DIVISION

HAO LIU

v.
CITY OF ALLEN, ET AL.

§
§
§
§
§

Civil Action No. 4:17-CV-874
(Judge Mazzant/Judge Nowak)

MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action,
this matter having been heretofore referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636.
On March 12, 2018, the report of the Magistrate Judge (Dkt. #7) was entered containing proposed
findings of fact and recommendations that Plaintiff Hao Liu’s Motion for Leave to File New Cause
(Dkt. #1) be denied. Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to File New Cause was filed in accordance the
Court’s pre-filing injunction imposed in the matter of Liu v. Medical Center of Plano, et al., 4:09CV-625 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 26, 2010), requiring Plaintiff to obtain leave of court to file a lawsuit in
this district. Since the entry of the Report and Recommendation, Plaintiff has filed “United States
#4 Motion 60-Days Application Extending Time Service Due to Destruction, Depredation
Government Property ‘Drake-Study’” (Dkt. #8), “United States #3 Motion Notice Obstruct
Scheduled Service Process to Support Extending Time” (Dkt. #9), and “United States #5 Motion
Executive Record Substitution Prosecution” (Dkt. #10). None of these filings contain specific
objections, much less relate, to the Report and Recommendation. Under Federal Rule of Civil
Procedure 72, an objection to a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation must be specific to
the proposed findings and recommendations. Only objections that are sufficiently specific to focus
the district court’s attention on the factual and legal issues in dispute should be considered.

Having received the report of the Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto having been
timely filed, the Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge
are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge’s report as the findings and conclusions of the Court.
It is, therefore, ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to File New Cause (Dkt. #1)

. is DENIED.
All relief not previously granted is hereby DENIED.
The Clerk is directed to CLOSE this civil action.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

SIGNED this 9th day of May, 2018.

___________________________________
AMOS L. MAZZANT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2