R A Guthrie Company, Inc. v. Bopari, et al
Filing
48
MEMORANDUM ADOPTING 42 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE. Accordingly, Plaintiff R A Guthrie Company, Inc.'s Motion for Entry of Default Judgment (the "Motion") (Dkt. # 26 ) is hereby GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The Court will enter Final Default Judgment under separate cover. Signed by District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 3/25/2021. (daj, )
Case 4:18-cv-00080-ALM-KPJ Document 48 Filed 03/25/21 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 463
United States District Court
EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
SHERMAN DIVISION
R A GUTHRIE COMPANY, INC.,
Plaintiff,
v.
SUKHMINDER BOPARAI and
PATCH MAGIC, LLC,
Defendants.
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
Civil Action No. 4:18-cv-080-ALM-KPJ
MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action,
this matter having been heretofore referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636.
On March 1, 2021, the Magistrate Judge entered proposed findings of fact and recommendations
(the “Report”) (Dkt. #42) that Plaintiff R A Guthrie Company, Inc.’s Motion for Entry of Default
Judgment (the “Motion”) (Dkt. #26) be granted in part and denied in part.
Having received the Report of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no timely objections
being filed, the Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge
are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge’s report as the findings and conclusions of the Court.
.
Accordingly, Plaintiff R A Guthrie Company, Inc.’s Motion for Entry of Default Judgment
(the “Motion”) (Dkt. #26) is hereby GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The Court
will enter Final Default Judgment under separate cover.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
SIGNED this 25th day of March, 2021.
___________________________________
AMOS L. MAZZANT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?