Diaz-Vivo v. USA

Filing 9

MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE for 8 Report and Recommendations. It is ORDERED that Plaintiff's civil action requesting return of property is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice. Fed. R. Crim. P. 41(b). Signed by District Judge Marcia A. Crone on 7/11/2018. (baf, )

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT KENNETH DIAZ-VIVO versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS § § § CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:18CV131 § § MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On June 5, 2018, the report of the Magistrate Judge (Dkt. #8) was entered containing proposed findings of fact and recommendations that Plaintiff Kenneth Diaz-Vivo’s Motion Requesting Return of Property Pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 41(g) (Dkt. #1) be dismissed without prejudice. Having received the report of the Magistrate Judge (Dkt. #8), and no objections thereto having been timely filed, the Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge’s report as the findings and conclusions of the Court. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Plaintiff’s civil action requesting return of property is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice. Fed. R. Crim. P. 41(b). IT IS SO ORDERED. . SIGNED at Beaumont, Texas, this 7th day of September, 2004. SIGNED at Plano, Texas, this 11th day of July, 2018. ________________________________________ MARCIA A. CRONE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?