Cunningham v. Greenstar Capital Solutions, LLC et al
Filing
34
MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE for 31 Report and Recommendations. It is, therefore, ORDERED Plaintiff's "Motion for a Default Judgment and Request for Hearing to Determine Damages" (Dkt. 20 ) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART, and a default judgment shall be entered for Plaintiff. Signed by District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 9/24/2018. (baf, )
United States District Court
EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
SHERMAN DIVISION
CRAIG CUNNINGHAM
v.
GREENSTAR CAPITAL SOLUTIONS,
LLC
§
§ Civil Action No. 4:18-CV-161
§ (Judge Mazzant/Judge Nowak)
§
§
MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action,
this matter having been heretofore referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636.
On August 1, 2018, the report of the Magistrate Judge (Dkt. #31) was entered containing proposed
findings of fact and recommendations that Plaintiff’s “Motion for a Default Judgment and Request
for Hearing to Determine Damages” (Dkt. #20) be granted in part and denied in part, that default
judgment be entered for Plaintiff, and that Plaintiff should be awarded $23,500.00 as statutory
damages.
Having received the report of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto
having been timely filed, this Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the
Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge’s report as the findings and
conclusions of the Court.
It is, therefore, ORDERED Plaintiff’s “Motion for a Default Judgment and Request for
Hearing to Determine Damages” (Dkt. #20) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART,
and a default judgment shall be entered for Plaintiff.
SIGNED this 24th day of September, 2018.
___________________________________
AMOS L. MAZZANT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?