Jaramillo v. USA
MEMORANDUM ADOPTING 7 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE. Plaintiff's Motion for Return of Seized Property Dkt. 1 is DENIED. All relief not previously granted is DENIED. The Clerk is directed to CLOSE this civil action. Signed by District Judge Marcia A. Crone on 8/13/2018. (rpc, )
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
§ CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:18CV266
MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action,
this matter having been heretofore referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636.
On July 10, 2018, the report of the Magistrate Judge [Dkt. 7] was entered containing proposed
findings of fact and recommendations that Plaintiff Jesus Jaramillo’s (“Plaintiff”) “Motion for
Return of Seize[d] Property” (“Motion for Return of Seized Property”) [Dkt. 1] be DENIED
and that the Court accept the designation of Defendant’s spouse, Ms. Laura Rivera Carrasco, to
pick up any remaining property from the Dallas Police Department.
Having received the report of the Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto having
been timely filed, the Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate
Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge’s report as the findings and conclusions of the
It is, therefore, ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Return of Seized Property
[Dkt. 1] is DENIED.
It is further ORDERED that the Court accepts the designation of Ms. Rivera to pick up
any remaining property from the Dallas Police Department.
All relief not previously granted is DENIED.
The Clerk is directed to CLOSE this civil action.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
SIGNED at Beaumont, Texas, this 7th day of September, 2004.
SIGNED at Beaumont, Texas, this 13th day of August, 2018.
MARCIA A. CRONE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?