Webster v. Commissioner, SSA
Filing
24
MEMORANDUM ADOPTING 23 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE. It is, therefore, ORDERED that Plaintiff's Application for Attorney's Fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (Dkt. # 18 ) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Signed by District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 3/30/2020. (daj, )
United States District Court
EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
SHERMAN DIVISION
TAMI WEBSTER
§
§
§
§
§
v.
COMMISSIONER, SSA
Civil Action No. 4:18-CV-328
(Judge Mazzant/Judge Nowak)
MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action,
this matter having been heretofore referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636.
On March 12, 2020, the report of the Magistrate Judge (Dkt. #23) was entered containing proposed
findings of fact and recommendations that Plaintiff’s post-judgment Application for Attorney’s
Fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (Dkt. #18) be granted in part and denied in part.
Having received the report of the Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto having been
timely filed, the Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge
are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge’s report as the findings and conclusions of the Court.
It is, therefore, ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Application for Attorney’s Fees under the Equal
Access to Justice Act (Dkt. #18) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART, and the
.
Commissioner is directed to pay nine thousand two hundred eighty-four dollars and forty-three
cents ($9,284.43) as reasonable attorney’s and paralegal fees and costs, made payable to Plaintiff,
with such payment to be mailed to Plaintiff’s counsel.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
SIGNED this 30th day of March, 2020.
___________________________________
AMOS L. MAZZANT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?