Cunningham v. Politi et al

Filing 149

MEMORANDUM ADOPTING 141 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE. It is therefore ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for a Default Judgment (Dkt. # 136 ) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. A default judgment shall be entered for Plaintiff. Signed by District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 4/8/2020. (daj, )

Download PDF
United States District Court EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION CRAIG CUNNINGHAM § § § § § v. JAY POLITI, ET AL. Civil Action No. 4:18-CV-362 (Judge Mazzant/Judge Nowak) MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On January 26, 2020, the report of the Magistrate Judge (Dkt. #141) was entered containing proposed findings of fact and recommendations that Plaintiff Craig Cunningham’s Motion for a Default Judgment (Dkt. #136) be granted in part and denied in part, and that Plaintiff be awarded $1,000.00 as statutory damages against Defendant Moisos Espinosa and $3,500.00 as statutory damages against Defendants Jasmine Wicks, Jay Politi, Axis Benefit Solutions, Inc., and Axis Advisory Group, Inc. for violations of § 227(b) of the TCPA. Having received the report of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto having been timely filed, the Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge’s report as the findings and . conclusions of the Court. It is therefore ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for a Default Judgment (Dkt. #136) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. A default judgment shall be entered for Plaintiff. IT IS SO ORDERED. SIGNED this 8th day of April, 2020. ___________________________________ AMOS L. MAZZANT UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?