The King/Morocco v. Park Place Lexus Plano

Filing 22

MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE for 21 Report and Recommendations. It is, therefore, ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice (Dkt. # 14 ) is GRANTED and each of Plaintiffs claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. All relief not previously granted is DENIED. The Clerk is directed to CLOSE this civil action. Signed by District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 9/10/2019. (daj, )

Download PDF
United States District Court EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION THE KING/MOROCCO v. PARK PLACE LEXUS PLANO § § § § § Civil Action No. 4:18-CV-780 (Judge Mazzant/Judge Nowak) MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On August 6, 2019, the report of the Magistrate Judge (Dkt. #21) was entered containing proposed findings of fact and recommendations that Defendant Park Place Lexus Plano’s Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice (Dkt. #14) be granted and each of Plaintiff’s claims be dismissed with prejudice. Having received the report of the Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto having been timely filed, the Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge’s report as the findings and conclusions of the Court. It is, therefore, ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice (Dkt. #14) . is GRANTED and each of Plaintiff’s claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. All relief not previously granted is DENIED. The Clerk is directed to CLOSE this civil action. IT IS SO ORDERED. SIGNED this 10th day of September, 2019. ___________________________________ AMOS L. MAZZANT UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?