Stephen, Jr. v. Pinkston et al
Filing
29
MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 27 . It is ORDERED that pro se Plaintiff Jonathan D. Stephen, Jr.'s complaint against Defendants Kathryn Pinkston and Texas Department of Criminal Justice is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 7/29/2022. (mcg)
United States District Court
EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
SHERMAN DIVISION
JONATHAN D. STEPHEN, JR., #2317147
v.
KATHRYN PINKSTON, ET AL.
§
§
§
§
§
Civil Action No. 4:21-CV-673
(Judge Mazzant/Judge Nowak)
MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action,
this matter having been heretofore referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636.
On June 21, 2022, the report of the Magistrate Judge (Dkt. #27) was entered containing proposed
findings of fact and recommendations that pro se Plaintiff Jonathan D. Stephen, Jr.’s complaint
against Defendants Kathryn Pinkston and Texas Department of Criminal Justice be dismissed
without prejudice under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41(b).
Having received the report of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto
having been timely filed, the Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the
Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge’s report as the findings and
conclusions of the Court.
It is therefore ORDERED that pro se Plaintiff Jonathan D. Stephen, Jr.’s complaint against
Defendants Kathryn Pinkston and Texas Department of Criminal Justice is DISMISSED
WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
All relief not previously granted is DENIED.
The Clerk is directed to CLOSE this civil action.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
SIGNED this 29th day of July, 2022.
___________________________________
AMOS L. MAZZANT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?