Santana v. Mama Pita LLC et al

Filing 41

MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE. It is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff's claims in this action against Defendants are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. All relief not previously granted is hereby DENIED, and the Clerk is directed to CLOSE this civil action. Signed by District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 11/17/2022. (rpc, )

Download PDF
Case 4:21-cv-00861-ALM-KPJ Document 41 Filed 11/17/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 195 United States District Court EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION VICENTE SANTANA, Plaintiff, v. MAMA PITA, LLC, et al., Defendants. § § § § § § § § § § Civil Action No. 4:21-cv-861-ALM-KPJ MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On October 5, 2022, the Magistrate Judge entered a report and recommendation (Dkt. #39) that Plaintiff Vicente Santana’s (“Plaintiff”) claims against Defendants Mama Pita LLC, Bechara Harfouche, and Ayaz Shaikh (together, “Defendants”) be dismissed without prejudice. Having received the Report of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no timely objections being filed, the Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge . are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge’s report as the findings and conclusions of the Court. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff’s claims in this action against Defendants are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. All relief not previously granted is hereby DENIED, and the Clerk is directed to CLOSE this civil action. SIGNED this 17th day of November, 2022. ___________________________________ AMOS L. MAZZANT UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?