Thompson v. Stief et al

Filing 19

MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE. It is ORDERED the Motion to Dismiss, (Dkt. # 10 ), is DENIED AS MOOT and the Motion to Dismiss for Want of Prosecution, (Dkt. # 13 ), is GRANTED. Accordingly, Plaintiff Randal Lee Thompsons claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. All relief not previously granted is DENIED. The Clerk is directed to CLOSE this civil action. (Motion(s) 13 , 10 terminated). Signed by District Judge Sean D. Jordan on 1/3/2025. (jmb)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
SHERMAN DIVISION
RANDAL LEE THOMPSON
v.
DANIEL STIEF, ET AL.

§
§
§
§
§
§

CIVIL N0. 4:22-CV-742-SDJ-BD

MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in
this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the Magistrate Judge
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On August 28, 2024, the Magistrate Judge entered
proposed findings of fact and recommendations, (Dkt. #17), that Defendants Daniel
Stief and Keith Bartlett’s Motion to Dismiss, (Dkt. #10), be denied as moot and
Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss for Want of Prosecution, (Dkt. #13), be granted.
Having received the Report of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no
timely objections being filed, the Court is of the opinion that the findings and
conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge’s
report as the findings and conclusions of the Court.
It is therefore ORDERED the Motion to Dismiss, (Dkt. #10), is DENIED AS
MOOT and the Motion to Dismiss for Want of Prosecution, (Dkt. #13), is GRANTED.
Accordingly, Plaintiff Randal Lee Thompson’s claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT
PREJUDICE.

1

All relief not previously granted is DENIED. The Clerk is directed to CLOSE
this civil action.
So ORDERED and SIGNED this 3rd day of January, 2025.

____________________________________
SEAN D. JORDAN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2