Stan v. Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB et al

Filing 7

MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE for #5 Report and Recommendations, Order. It is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motions (Dkts. #1 , #4 ) are DENIED to the extent Plaintiff is requesting a temporary restraining order and/or injunction. Signed by District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 11/17/2022. (baf, )

Download PDF
Case 4:22-cv-00907-ALM-KPJ Document 7 Filed 11/17/22 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 48 United States District Court EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION JOY STAN, also known as JOY ONYEDEBELU, Plaintiff, v. WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY, FSB, et al., Defendants. § § § § § § § § § § § Civil Action No. 4:22-cv-907-ALM-KPJ MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On October 21, 2022, the Magistrate Judge entered proposed findings of fact and recommendations (the “Report”) (Dkt. #5) that Plaintiff’s Emergency Complaint (Dkt. #1) and Emergency Motion (Dkt. #4) be denied to the extent Plaintiff requests a temporary restraining order and/or injunction. Having received the Report of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no timely objections being filed, the Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge . are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge’s report as the findings and conclusions of the Court. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motions (Dkts. #1, #4) are DENIED to the extent Plaintiff is requesting a temporary restraining order and/or injunction. IT IS SO ORDERED. SIGNED this 17th day of November, 2022. ___________________________________ AMOS L. MAZZANT UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?