Dixon v. Federal Bureau of Investigation et al

Filing 22

MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE. It is ORDERED the Motion to Dismiss, (Dkt. # 13 ), is GRANTED, and this case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by District Judge Sean D. Jordan on 6/5/2024. (jmb)

Download PDF
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION JENNIFER AUDREY DIXON v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, ET AL. § § § § § § Civil Action No. 4:23-cv-383-SDJ-KPJ MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On March 17, 2024, the Magistrate Judge entered proposed findings of fact and a recommendation (the “Report”), (Dkt. #20), that Defendant Federal Bureau of Investigation’s (the “FBI”) Motion to Dismiss, (Dkt. #13), be granted. Having received the Report of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no timely objections being filed,1 the Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge’s Report as the findings and conclusions of the Court. It is therefore ORDERED the Motion to Dismiss, (Dkt. #13), is GRANTED, and this case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. On March 18, 2023, the Clerk of Court mailed the Report to Plaintiff via Certified Mail Return Receipt Requested, which has not yet been delivered. On April 22, 2024, the Clerk of Court resent the Report to Plaintiff via Certified Mail Return Receipt Requested, which was successfully delivered on April 24, 2024. (Dkt. #21). 1 1 So ORDERED and SIGNED this 5th day of June, 2024. ____________________________________ SEAN D. JORDAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?