ESN LLC v. Cisco Systems, Inc. et al

Filing 182

ORDER granting 181 Motion to Redact re 179 Transcript,,,,. Signed by Judge David Folsom on 12/17/09. (mrm, )

Download PDF
ESN LLC v. Cisco Systems, Inc. et al Doc. 182 Case 5:08-cv-00020-DF Document 181-2 Filed 12/16/2009 Page 1 of 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TEXARKANA DIVISION ESN, LLC, Plaintiff, v. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., and CISCO-LINKSYS, LLC, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. 5:08-cv-20-DF JURY TRIAL DEMANDED [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR ADDITIONAL REDACTION Defendants Cisco Systems, Inc. and Cisco-Linksys, LLC (collectively, "Cisco") moved for an order redacting one and one-half pages from the sixty-six page transcript of the parties' November 20, 2009 motion hearing. Dkt. 179. Cisco filed notice of its intent to request redaction on December 16, 2009. Dkt. 180. Plaintiff ESN, LLC ("ESN") does not oppose Cisco's motion. Accordingly, such motion is GRANTED, and it is ORDERED THAT the transcript of the November 20, 2009 claim construction hearing is sealed as follows: Page 17, lines 17 through 19 ("Iperia ... themselves."); Page 26, lines 17 through 20 ("Iperia ... argued."); Page 29, lines 19 through 23 ("Cisco ... license."); Page 30, lines 1 through 5 ("Cisco's ... argued."); Page 34, line 5 (three words following "payment"); Page 34, line 25 through page 35, line 10 ("It ... rights."); Page 36, line 24 (entire); Page 36, line 25 through page 37, line 3 ("litigation ... source."); and Page 37, lines 12 through 15 ("In ... rights."). . It is further ordered that the court reporter shall redact those passages from all publicly available versions of the transcript. SIGNED this 17th day of December, 2009. ____________________________________ Dockets.Justia.com DAVID FOLSOM

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?