ESN LLC v. Cisco Systems, Inc. et al

Filing 31

ORDER re 29 Protective Order. The parties field a Joint Motion for Protective Order (Dkt. No. 28) and attached a ProposedProtective Order (Dkt. No. 28, Exh. 1). Due to an oversight, the Court filed that proposed protectiveorder that included the parties competing provisions for paragraph 14(d)(I).The Court hereby VACATES Protective Order (Dkt. No. 29). Signed by Judge David Folsom on 6/3/08. (mpv, )

Download PDF
ESN LLC v. Cisco Systems, Inc. et al Doc. 31 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TEXARKANA DIVISION ESN, LLC, Plaintiff, v. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., and CISCOLINKSYS, LLC, Defendants. § § § § § § CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:08-CV-20 (DF) § § § § § ORDER The parties field a Joint Motion for Protective Order (Dkt. No. 28) and attached a Proposed . Protective Order (Dkt. No. 28, Exh. 1). Due to an oversight, the Court filed that proposed protective order that included the parties' competing provisions for paragraph 14(d)(I). The Court hereby VACATES Protective Order (Dkt. No. 29). It is so ORDERED. SIGNED this 3rd day of June, 2008. ____________________________________ DAVID FOLSOM UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 1 Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?