ESN LLC v. Cisco Systems, Inc. et al

Filing 92

Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge David Folsom: Markman Hearing held on 6/11/2009. (Court Reporter Libby Crawford.) (mrm, )

ESN LLC v. Cisco Systems, Inc. et al

Doc. 92

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TEX A RKA NA DIVISION Judge David Folsom ESN LLC )( )( V. )( CIVIL NO. 5:08CV20 )( CISCO SYSTEMS )( ________________________________________________________________________ ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFFS: Peter McAndrews; Gerald Willis; Johnny Ward

ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANTS: Sayuri Sharper; Charles Verhoeven; Michael Jones LAW CLERK: COURTROOM DEPUTY: David Keyzer Mel Martin

COURT REPORTER: Libby Crawford _________________________________________________________________________ CLAIM CONSTRUCTION HEARING June 11, 2009 @ 9:00 am OPEN: 8:57 ADJOURN: 11:47 _________________________________________________________________________ 8:57 ct opens; ct/ preliminary claim construction; will give you a few minutes to review; will make this exhibit 1 to the record; 8:59 9:15 9:15 9:15 9:16 9:16 9:17 recess; ct resumes; McAndrews/ final 5 we will rest on briefs Verhoeven/ responds; 2, 3, and 4th we agree with courts construction; ct/ any the plf can agree on McAndrews/ can agree on 3, 4, 5; term 2 will rest on brief; ct/ why you feel courts construction is not appropriate or needs some briefing;

Dockets.Justia.com

9:17 9:19 9:20 9:21 9:21 9:21 9:21 9:21 9:22 9:23 9:31 9:36 9:37 9:37

McAndrews/ responds "telephone line interface"; Verhoeven/ reply; ct/ will adopt construction in 3, 4, and 5; ptys do not agree with 1 and 6 and will take those up; Verhoeven/ we rest on our papers as to # 4; ct/ plf agrees to 4 McAndrews/ that is correct; ct/ so that leaves us 1 and 6; McAndrews/ address' the ct; ct/ go forward with the rest of claim construction; McAndrews/ presentation; Verhoeven/ responds; McAndrews/ reply; ct/ which claim term; McAndrews/ Sip terms; and then that will leave us with 6th term on the sheet and we will stand on our papers; Verhoeven/ agrees; ct/ would like to hear why you disagree with my preliminary construction; McAndrews/ will address that now Verhoeven/ the point counsel just made, your construction is clearer; ct/ will make slides a part of the record; McAndrews/ reply; ct/ ready to go forward on the balance and that will be all one group McAndrews/ that is correct; "SIP" 9:58 "SIP Agents"; 10:15 "SIP proxy server", 10:24 "SIP proxy server that mediates all SIP communications over the broadband network interface

9:38 9:38 9:38 9:42 9:43 9:45 9:46 9:47

involving the non-sip telephone", 10:36 recess; 10:47 Verhoeven/ response; "SIP"; 11:11 "SIP User Agent"; 11:33 McAndrews/ reply; 11:44 ct/ make slides from tutorial and claim construction hrg a part of the record; 11:45 McAndrews/ address' the ct; third party; 11:47 ct/ address' the ptys re: conference when does 60 days run; 11:47 McAndrews/ July 19th; 11:47 ct/ if you can't work through it file appropriate motion; 11:47 recess;