Williams v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
Filing
16
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 15 Report and Recommendations, granting 14 Unopposed MOTION to Remand to Social Security Administration filed by Commissioner Social Security Administration. Signed by Judge David Folsom on 10/4/11. (mrm, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
OF THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
TEXARKANA DIVISION
TAMATHA P. WILLIAMS,
Plaintiff
V.
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,
Commissioner of Social
Security Administration,
Defendant
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
No. 5:10CV196
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
The above-entitled and numbered civil action was heretofore referred to United States
Magistrate Judge Caroline M. Craven pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. The Report of the Magistrate
Judge which contains her proposed findings of fact and recommendations for the disposition of such
action has been presented for consideration. No objections to the Report and Recommendation were
filed. The Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are
correct. Therefore, the Court hereby adopts the Report of the United States Magistrate Judge as the
findings and conclusions of this Court. Accordingly, it is hereby
ORDERED that Defendant’s Unopposed Motion for Reversal and Remand (Dkt. No. 14)
is GRANTED. It is further
ORDERED that the above-captioned matter is remanded to the Commissioner, pursuant to
the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), for further administrative proceedings. It is further
ORDERED that on remand, the Appeals Council will direct an Administrative Law Judge
to hold a new hearing and obtain additional vocational expert testimony, and, if warranted, obtain
medical expert testimony and/or a consultative physical examination report. It is further
.
ORDERED that all motions not previously ruled on are DENIED, and the referral order is
VACATED.
SIGNED this 4th day of October, 2011.
____________________________________
DAVID FOLSOM
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?