Million v. GROUNDS et al
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 63 Report and Recommendations, DENYING 61 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order filed by Earl Raymond Million.. Signed by Judge Michael H. Schneider on 10/30/2014. (sm, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
EARL RAYMOND MILLION, #1170997
DAWN E. GROUNDS, ET AL.
CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:14cv11
Plaintiff Earl Raymond Million, an inmate previously confined at the Telford Unit of the
Texas prison system, proceeding pro se, filed the above-styled and numbered civil rights lawsuit.
The complaint was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Caroline M. Craven, who issued a
Report and Recommendation concluding that the Plaintiff’s motion for a temporary restraining
order and/or preliminary injunction should be denied. The Plaintiff has filed objections.
The Report of the Magistrate Judge, which contains her proposed findings of fact and
recommendations for the disposition of such action, has been presented for consideration, and
having made a de novo review of the objections raised by the Plaintiff to the Report, the Court is
of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and the
objections of the Plaintiff are without merit. It is specifically noted that any complaints that the
Plaintiff may have about the conditions of his current confinement should be presented to the court
having jurisdiction over the unit where he is presently confined, as opposed to this Court.
Therefore the Court adopts the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge as the findings an
conclusions of the Court. It is accordingly
ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (docket entry #63) is ADOPTED. It is
ORDERED that the Plaintiff’s motion for a temporary restraining order and/or preliminary
injunction (docket entry #61) is DENIED.
It is SO ORDERED.
SIGNED this 30th day of October, 2014.
MICHAEL H. SCHNEIDER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?