Davis v. Evans et al
Filing
15
ORDER ADOPTING 9 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS and ORDERED that claims against Defendant Jon Braun is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for purposes of proceeding in forma pauperis as frivolous and for failure to state a claim which relief may be granted. Jon Braun is now terminated.. Signed by Judge Robert W. Schroeder, III on 7/20/2016. (sm, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
TEXARKANA DIVISION
FIDEL DAVIS
§
v.
§
T. EVANS, ET AL.
§
CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:15cv138
MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
ON DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT JON BRAUN
The Plaintiff Fidel Davis, proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights lawsuit under 42 U.S.C.
§1983 complaining of alleged violations of his constitutional rights in the Texas Department of
Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division. This Court ordered that the case be referred to
the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1) and (3) and the Amended Order
for the Adoption of Local Rules for the Assignment of Duties to United States Magistrate Judges.
Plaintiff named a fellow inmate, Jon Braun, as a defendant in the lawsuit, stating Braun
sexually assaulted him while he slept. The Magistrate Judge issued a Report recommending the
claims against Braun be dismissed because Braun did not act under color of state law and thus is not
amenable to suit under §1983.
In his objections, Davis does not address the issue of state action; instead, he cites an Eighth
Circuit case called Wade v. Haynes, 663 F.2d 778 (8th Cir. 1981), but that case dealt with the
liability of prison officials, not the liability of a prisoner. He also refers to the Fifth Circuit decision
in Alexander v. Ieyoub, 62 F.3d 709 (5th Cir. 1995), which involved the owner of a seized car
bringing suit against district attorneys and assistant district attorneys for denial of due process in the
course of forfeiture proceedings, but fails to show how this decision applies in the present case. The
Magistrate Judge correctly determined Braun was not a state actor and therefore not subject to suit
under §1983. Johnson v. Dallas Independent School District, 38 F.3d 198, 199 (5th Cir. 1994);
1
Gamez-Abrego v. Orleans Parish Jail, civil action no. 10-1595, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 91046
(E.D.La., July 19, 2010), Report adopted at 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 91051 (E.D.La., September 1,
2010) (an inmate involved in a prison fight is not a person acting under color of state law as required
for liability under §1983). Plaintiff’s objections are without merit.
The Court has conducted a careful de novo review of those portions of the Magistrate Judge’s
proposed findings and recommendations to which the Plaintiff objected. See 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1)
(district judge shall “make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified
proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made.”) Upon such de novo review,
the Court has determined that the Report of the Magistrate Judge is correct and the Plaintiff’s
.
objections are without merit. It is accordingly
ORDERED the Plaintiff’s objections are overruled and the Report of the Magistrate Judge
regarding defendant Jon Braun (docket no. 9) is ADOPTED as the opinion of the District Court.
It is further
ORDERED the Plaintiff’s claims against the Defendant Jon Braun are DISMISSED WITH
PREJUDICE for purposes of proceeding in forma pauperis as frivolous and for failure to state a
claim upon which relief may be granted. The dismissal of these claims shall not affect the remaining
claims in the lawsuit.
SIGNED this 20th day of July, 2016.
____________________________________
ROBERT W. SCHROEDER III
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?