Packet Tread LLC v. RAD Data Communications, Inc.

Filing 8

MEMORANDUM ORDER ADOPTING 6 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE and Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE the cases. Signed by Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 9/25/2017. (sm, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT OF THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TEXARKANA DIVISION PACKET TREAD LLC, Plaintiff, § § § v. § § RAD DATA COMMUNICATIONS, INC. § Defendant. § § § § v. § § VANGUARD NETWORKS SOLUTIONS§ LLC § Defendant. § Case No. 5:17-cv-4-JRG-CMC PACKET TREAD LLC, Plaintiff, Case No. 5:17-cv-16-JRG-CMC MEMORANDUM ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE The above-entitled and numbered civil actions were referred to United States Magistrate Judge Caroline M. Craven pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. The Reports of the Magistrate Judge which contain her proposed findings of fact and recommendations for the disposition of such actions has been presented for consideration. On September 7, 2017, the Magistrate Judge recommended the above cases be dismissed for want of prosecution pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 41(b). No objections were filed to the Reports. Rather, on September 21, 2017, Plaintiff Packet Tread LLC filed responses to the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, stating it does not object to the recommendations the Court dismiss the cases without prejudice. The Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct. Therefore, the Court hereby adopts the Reports of the United States Magistrate Judge as the findings and conclusions of this Court. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff’s above-entitled and numbered causes of action are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 41(b). All relief not previously granted is hereby DENIED. The Clerk of the Court is directed to CLOSE the cases. IT IS SO ORDERED. So Ordered this Sep 25, 2017 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?