Packet Tread LLC v. Vanguard Networks Solutions LLC
Filing
9
ORDER ADOPTING 7 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS AND ORDERED that causes of action are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to Rule 41 and Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE the cases. Signed by Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 9/25/2017. (sm, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
OF THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
TEXARKANA DIVISION
PACKET TREAD LLC,
Plaintiff,
§
§
§
v.
§
§
RAD DATA COMMUNICATIONS, INC. §
Defendant.
§
§
§
§
v.
§
§
VANGUARD NETWORKS SOLUTIONS§
LLC
§
Defendant.
§
Case No. 5:17-cv-4-JRG-CMC
PACKET TREAD LLC,
Plaintiff,
Case No. 5:17-cv-16-JRG-CMC
MEMORANDUM ORDER ADOPTING
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE
The above-entitled and numbered civil actions were referred to United States Magistrate
Judge Caroline M. Craven pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. The Reports of the Magistrate Judge which
contain her proposed findings of fact and recommendations for the disposition of such actions has
been presented for consideration. On September 7, 2017, the Magistrate Judge recommended the
above cases be dismissed for want of prosecution pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 41(b).
No objections were filed to the Reports. Rather, on September 21, 2017, Plaintiff Packet
Tread LLC filed responses to the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate
Judge, stating it does not object to the recommendations the Court dismiss the cases without
prejudice.
The Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are
correct. Therefore, the Court hereby adopts the Reports of the United States Magistrate Judge as the
findings and conclusions of this Court. Accordingly, it is hereby
ORDERED that Plaintiff’s above-entitled and numbered causes of action are DISMISSED
WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 41(b).
All relief not previously granted is hereby DENIED.
The Clerk of the Court is directed to CLOSE the cases.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
So Ordered this
Sep 25, 2017
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?