Franks v. Bowie County Texas
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Ordering that petitioner's objections regarding venue are Overruled. It is FURTHER ORDERED this petition is TRANSFERRED to the the Eastern District of Arkansas. Signed by District Judge Robert W. Schroeder, III on 1/9/2018. (sm, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
BOWIE COUNTY, TEXAS
CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:17-CV-200
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
The Court previously referred this petition for writ of habeas corpus to the Honorable
Caroline M. Craven, United States Magistrate Judge. The Magistrate Judge has entered a
Memorandum Opinion and Order Regarding Venue providing that this matter be transferred to
the Western Division for the Eastern District of Arkansas. Docket Nos. 3 and 4. Petitioner has
filed a response to the Memorandum Opinion and Order. Docket No. 6. This Court liberally
construes the response as objections to the transfer of venue.
The Magistrate Judge’s Memorandum Opinion and Order involved a nondispositive matter.
A District Judge may reconsider any such order where it is shown that the order is clearly erroneous
or contrary to law. Castillo v. Frank, 70 F.3d 382, 385 (5th Cir. 1995); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A).
Petitioner is incarcerated pursuant to a judgment filed in Case Number CR-96-002472 in
the Circuit Court of Pulaski County, Arkansas. Docket No. 1 at 3. Petitioner states he has been
forcibly transferred from the custody of the Arkansas Department of Corrections to the Bowie
County Correctional Center in Texarkana, Texas. Id. at 2. He states this action was taken
pursuant to an order from the director of the Arkansas Department of Corrections. Id. Petitioner
states no charges have been filed against him in Texas and complains that his transfer to the
Bowie County Correctional Center violates the orders of the Arkansas state court where he was
convicted. Id. The Magistrate Judge concluded the petition should be transferred to the Eastern
District of Arkansas because his incarceration is the result of his conviction in an Arkansas state
court. Docket No. 3 at 2. In his objections, petitioner merely states he opposes the transfer but
provides no specific justification for his objections. Docket No. 6.
After careful consideration, the Court is of the opinion that the Magistrate Judge’s
Memorandum Opinion and Order was not clearly erroneous or contrary to law. This Court and the
Eastern District of Arkansas have concurrent jurisdiction over this petition.1 As petitioner’s
incarceration in the Bowie County Correctional Center is due to his conviction in an Arkansas state
court and is not the result of any process issued by a Texas state court, it would be more appropriate
to have this petition adjudicated in the federal judicial district where a challenge to petitioner’s
Arkansas conviction would be asserted. The Magistrate Judge therefore correctly concluded this
petition should be transferred. It is, therefore,
ORDERED that petitioner’s objections (Docket No. 6) to the Memorandum Opinion and
Order Regarding Venue are OVERRULED.
It is further ORDERED this petition is
TRANSFERRED to the Western Division for the Eastern District of Arkansas.
SIGNED this 9th day of January, 2018.
ROBERT W. SCHROEDER III
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Title 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d) provides that a habeas petition may be filed in either the
federal judicial district where the petitioner was convicted or the judicial district where he is
Page 2 of 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?