Arnold v. Andrew Saul, Commissioner of SSA

Filing 17

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 16 Report and Recommendations. It is ORDERED that Plaintiff's above-entitled Social Security action is hereby AFFIRMED. It is further ORDERED that all motions not previously ruled on are DENIED, and the referral order is VACATED. Signed by District Judge Robert W. Schroeder, III on 9/7/2021. (slo, )

Download PDF
Case 5:20-cv-00019-RWS-CMC Document 17 Filed 09/07/21 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 722 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT OF THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TEXARKANA DIVISION SIDNEY ARNOLD, JR. § VS. § COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION § CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:20cv19-RWS-CMC ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE The above-entitled and numbered civil action was heretofore referred to United States Magistrate Judge Caroline M. Craven pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. The Report of the Magistrate Judge which contains her proposed findings of fact and recommendations for the disposition of such action has been presented for consideration. On August 13, 2021, the Magistrate Judge recommended Plaintiff’s social security action be affirmed. Plaintiff, who is represented by counsel, did not file any objections to the Report and Recommendation. . The Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct. Therefore, the Court hereby adopts the Report of the United States Magistrate Judge as the findings and conclusions of this Court. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff’s above-entitled Social Security action is hereby AFFIRMED. It is further ORDERED that all motions not previously ruled on are DENIED, and the referral order is VACATED. SIGNED this 7th day of September, 2021. ____________________________________ ROBERT W. SCHROEDER III UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?