Arnold v. Andrew Saul, Commissioner of SSA
Filing
17
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 16 Report and Recommendations. It is ORDERED that Plaintiff's above-entitled Social Security action is hereby AFFIRMED. It is further ORDERED that all motions not previously ruled on are DENIED, and the referral order is VACATED. Signed by District Judge Robert W. Schroeder, III on 9/7/2021. (slo, )
Case 5:20-cv-00019-RWS-CMC Document 17 Filed 09/07/21 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 722
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
OF THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
TEXARKANA DIVISION
SIDNEY ARNOLD, JR.
§
VS.
§
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL
SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
§
CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:20cv19-RWS-CMC
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
The above-entitled and numbered civil action was heretofore referred to United States
Magistrate Judge Caroline M. Craven pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. The Report of the Magistrate
Judge which contains her proposed findings of fact and recommendations for the disposition of such
action has been presented for consideration.
On August 13, 2021, the Magistrate Judge
recommended Plaintiff’s social security action be affirmed. Plaintiff, who is represented by counsel,
did not file any objections to the Report and Recommendation.
.
The Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are
correct. Therefore, the Court hereby adopts the Report of the United States Magistrate Judge as the
findings and conclusions of this Court. Accordingly, it is hereby
ORDERED that Plaintiff’s above-entitled Social Security action is hereby AFFIRMED.
It is further
ORDERED that all motions not previously ruled on are DENIED, and the referral order is
VACATED.
SIGNED this 7th day of September, 2021.
____________________________________
ROBERT W. SCHROEDER III
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?