Rojas v. Jackson et al
Filing
21
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 19 Report and Recommendation. It is ORDERED that the above-styled civil action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE on the Plaintiff's motion. It is further ORDERED that any and all motions which may be pending in this civil action are hereby DENIED. Signed by District Judge Robert W. Schroeder, III on 9/7/2021. (slo, )
Case 5:20-cv-00096-RWS-CMC Document 21 Filed 09/07/21 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 51
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
TEXARKANA DIVISION
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
JULIO ROJAS
Plaintiff
v.
OFFICER JACKSON, ET AL.
Defendants
Case No. 5:20cv96
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
Plaintiff Julio Rojas, proceeding pro se, filed the above-styled and numbered civil action
complaining of alleged violations of his constitutional rights. The case was referred to the United
States Magistrate Judge in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636.
Plaintiff has asked for dismissal of his lawsuit, and the Magistrate Judge issued a Report
.
recommending this request be granted. The Plaintiff received a copy of this Report on August 2,
2021, but no objections have been received. It is accordingly
ORDERED that the Report of the Magistrate Judge (Docket No. 19) is ADOPTED as
the opinion of the District Court. It is further
ORDERED that the above-styled civil action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE
on the Plaintiff’s motion. It is further
ORDERED that any and all motions which may be pending in this civil action are hereby
DENIED.
SIGNED this 7th day of September, 2021.
____________________________________
ROBERT W. SCHROEDER III
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?