Rojas v. Jackson et al

Filing 21

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 19 Report and Recommendation. It is ORDERED that the above-styled civil action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE on the Plaintiff's motion. It is further ORDERED that any and all motions which may be pending in this civil action are hereby DENIED. Signed by District Judge Robert W. Schroeder, III on 9/7/2021. (slo, )

Download PDF
Case 5:20-cv-00096-RWS-CMC Document 21 Filed 09/07/21 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 51 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TEXARKANA DIVISION § § § § § § § § § § JULIO ROJAS Plaintiff v. OFFICER JACKSON, ET AL. Defendants Case No. 5:20cv96 ORDER OF DISMISSAL Plaintiff Julio Rojas, proceeding pro se, filed the above-styled and numbered civil action complaining of alleged violations of his constitutional rights. The case was referred to the United States Magistrate Judge in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636. Plaintiff has asked for dismissal of his lawsuit, and the Magistrate Judge issued a Report . recommending this request be granted. The Plaintiff received a copy of this Report on August 2, 2021, but no objections have been received. It is accordingly ORDERED that the Report of the Magistrate Judge (Docket No. 19) is ADOPTED as the opinion of the District Court. It is further ORDERED that the above-styled civil action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE on the Plaintiff’s motion. It is further ORDERED that any and all motions which may be pending in this civil action are hereby DENIED. SIGNED this 7th day of September, 2021. ____________________________________ ROBERT W. SCHROEDER III UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?