AdvanceMe Inc v. RapidPay LLC

Filing 300

NOTICE by AdvanceMe Inc of Objections to Defendants' Affirmative Deposition Designations (Bhakar, Vid)

Download PDF
AdvanceMe Inc v. RapidPay LLC Doc. 300 Case 6:05-cv-00424-LED Document 300 Filed 06/19/2007 Page 1 of 32 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION ADVANCEME, INC., Plaintiff v. RAPIDPAY LLC, FIRST FUNDS LLC, MERCHANT MONEY TREE, INC., REACH FINANCIAL, LLC, and FAST TRANSACT, INC. d/b/a SIMPLE CASH, Defendants. PLAINIFF ADVANCEME, INC.'S OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANTS' AFFIRMATIVE DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS Plaintiff AdvanceMe, Inc. hereby objects to Defendants' Affirmative Deposition Designations. § § § § § § § § § CASE NO. 6:05-CV-424 LED­JDL PLAINTIFF ADVANCEME, INC.'S OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANTS' AFFIRMATIVE DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS CASE NO.6:05-CV-424 LED-JDL Dockets.Justia.com Case 6:05-cv-00424-LED Document 300 Filed 06/19/2007 Page 2 of 32 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page DEPOSITION OF ALLEN ABBOTT, JANUARY 11, 2007 ....................................................... 4 DEPOSITION OF JAMES R. ALEXANDER, MARCH 9, 2007 ................................................ 5 DEPOSITION OF LAURENT F. BOUCHARD, JANUARY 31, 2007....................................... 6 DEPOSITION OF MICHELLE BOUDETTE, FEBRUARY 16, 2007 ........................................ 8 DEPOSITION OF JOHN RANDALL BOURNE, JANUARY 26, 2007 ..................................... 9 DEPOSITION OF JENNIFER L. CARTER, FEBRUARY 27, 2007......................................... 10 DEPOSITION OF RUTH ELASRI, FEBRUARY 22, 2007....................................................... 11 DEPOSITION OF LES FALKE, MARCH 2, 2007 .................................................................... 12 DEPOSITION OF JEANNETTE MAY GEPFORD, FEBRUARY 15, 2007............................. 13 DEPOSITION OF CLIFFORD CHARLES HARDWICK ......................................................... 14 DEPOSITION OF BARBARA JOHNSON, JUNE 28, 2006...................................................... 15 DEPOSITION OF GARY JOHNSON ........................................................................................ 16 DEPOSITION OF JOHN KONOP, FEBRUARY 8, 2007.......................................................... 17 DEPOSITION OF EDWARD W. LANDON, FEBRUARY 14, 2007 ....................................... 18 DEPOSITION OF THOMAS J. LITLE IV, SEPTEMBER 6. 2006 ........................................... 19 DEPOSITION OF NICK LOGAN, MARCH 1, 2007 ................................................................ 21 DEPOSITION OF DANIAL LOTT, FEBRUARY 16, 2007 ...................................................... 22 DEPOSITION OF ANTHONY S. MALEY, FEBRUARY 28, 2007 ......................................... 23 DEPOSITION OF TOM MCBREARTY, FEBRUARY 13, 2007.............................................. 24 DEPOSITION OF WILLIAM MORGENSTEIN, FEBRUARY 20, 2007 ................................. 25 DEPOSITION OF ADAM SECHER, JANUARY 30, 2007....................................................... 26 DEPOSITION OF GERETTE SORWELL, FEBRUARY 14, 2007........................................... 27 DEPOSITION OF LEE SUCKOW, OCTOBER 4, 2006............................................................ 28 DEPOSITION OF ANTHONY LEROY WILDEN, FEBRUARY 20, 2007.............................. 29 PLAINTIFF ADVANCEME, INC.'S OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANTS' AFFIRMATIVE DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS CASE NO.6:05-CV-424 LED-JDL -i- Case 6:05-cv-00424-LED Document 300 Filed 06/19/2007 Page 3 of 32 ADVANCEME'S OBJECTION KEY Code 106 Objection Incomplete. This testimony is objectionable because it is incomplete and the introduction of the remaining portions ought, in fairness, to be considered contemporaneously with it (see F.R.E. 106). 402 Relevance. This testimony is objectionable because it is not relevant (see F.R.E. 402). 403 Misleading/Confusion of Issues/Waste of Time. This testimony is objectionable because its probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of the issues, or by considerations of undue delay, waste of time, or needless presentation of cumulative evidence (see F.R.E. 403). 408 Compromise and Offer to Compromise. This testimony is objectionable because it relates to offers to compromise and/or settlement negotiations (see F.R.E. 408). 602 Personal Knowledge. This testimony is objectionable because it constitutes testimony on a matter as to which the witness lacks personal knowledge (see F.R.E. 602). 611 Vague and Ambiguous, Argumentative, Harassment, Undue Embarrassment, Leading. This testimony is objectionable because it is vague and ambiguous, argumentative, constitutes harassment or is unduly embarrassing to the witness, or the question is leading (see F.R.E. 611). 701 Lay Opinion/Legal Conclusion. This testimony is objectionable because it is opinion testimony by a lay witness that is not reasonably based on perception and helpful to a clear understanding of the witness' testimony or the determination of a fact in dispute (see F.R.E. 701). PLAINTIFF ADVANCEME, INC.'S OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANTS' AFFIRMATIVE DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS -1- CASE NO.6:05-CV-424 LED-JDL Case 6:05-cv-00424-LED Document 300 Filed 06/19/2007 Page 4 of 32 801 Hearsay. This testimony is objectionable because it is a statement made by one other than the declarant while testifying at trial, offered into evidence to prove the truth of the matter asserted and not subject to any hearsay exception (see F.R.E. 801 and 802). 901 Authentication. This testimony is objectionable because the evidence referred to therein has not been properly authenticated (see F.R.E. 901). 10011004 Best Evidence. This testimony is objectionable because it is vague and ambiguous as to whether the witness is summarizing its own independent understandings or the contents of a document. If the latter, attempt to prove content of a document with secondary evidence (see F.R.E. 1001-1004). A/C AA AF B Privilege. Attorney Client Privilege and/or Work Product Immunity Asked and Answered This testimony is objectionable because it assumes a fact not in evidence. Bolstering. This testimony in objectionable because it is improper to bolster the credibility of a witness before credibility is attacked (see F.R.E. 608 (a)). CQ CS E Compound Question Calls for Speculation This testimony is objectionable because it constitutes attempted expert testimony from a person who was not designated as an expert and who did not submit an expert report (see F.R.C.P. 26). F IA IC This testimony is objectionable because it lacks foundation. This testimony is objectionable because it is an incomplete answer. This testimony is objectionable because it has characterized a person or conduct CASE NO.6:05-CV-424 LED-JDL PLAINTIFF ADVANCEME, INC.'S OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANTS' AFFIRMATIVE DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS -2- Case 6:05-cv-00424-LED Document 300 Filed 06/19/2007 Page 5 of 32 with unwarranted suggestive, argumentative, or impertinent language (see F.R.E. 404-405). IE IQ MC N NR OS Improper opinion testimony by expert witness (F.R.E. 702) This testimony is objectionable because it is an incomplete question. Mischaracterizes witness's testimony Calls for narrative Nonresponsive Outside the scope of Rule 30(b)(6) topics PLAINTIFF ADVANCEME, INC.'S OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANTS' AFFIRMATIVE DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS -3- CASE NO.6:05-CV-424 LED-JDL Case 6:05-cv-00424-LED Document 300 Filed 06/19/2007 Page 6 of 32 DEPOSITION OF ALLEN ABBOTT, January 11, 2007 DEFENDANTS' DESIGNATED TESTIMONY ADVANCEME'S OBJECTIONS 21:23-24:4 25:6-27:6 28:2-28:14 38:15-39:5 39:9-39:24 40:7-41:23 62:19-63:11 63:24-64:18 71:6-71:11 81:8-82:6 84:13-85:5 85:19-86:3 87:1-89:22 89:24-90:4 92:4-92:18 92:20-92:20 93:3-94:7 94:9-95:6 95:8-95:8 CS, 611 402 106, 602 CS, 602, 106 801-804, 1001-1002, 1004 106, 801-804, 1001-1002, 1004 106 801-804, 1001-1002, 1004 402 801-804, 1001-1002, 1004 801-804, 1001-1002, 1004 801-804, 1001-1002, 1004 IQ, 801-804, 1001-1002, 1004 106 611, CS 106 801-804, 1001-1002, 1004 106, 611 106 PLAINTIFF ADVANCEME, INC.'S OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANTS' AFFIRMATIVE DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS -4- CASE NO.6:05-CV-424 LED-JDL Case 6:05-cv-00424-LED Document 300 Filed 06/19/2007 Page 7 of 32 DEPOSITION OF JAMES R. ALEXANDER, March 9, 2007 DEFENDANTS' DESIGNATED TESTIMONY ADVANCEME'S OBJECTIONS 12:15-13:4 13:20-14:6 15:2-15:11 27:16-27:21 34:11-35:4 611 106 106 IA, 106 CS, 801 PLAINTIFF ADVANCEME, INC.'S OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANTS' AFFIRMATIVE DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS -5- CASE NO.6:05-CV-424 LED-JDL Case 6:05-cv-00424-LED Document 300 Filed 06/19/2007 Page 8 of 32 DEPOSITION OF LAURENT F. BOUCHARD, January 31, 2007 DEFENDANTS' DESIGNATED TESTIMONY ADVANCEME'S OBJECTIONS 11:11-14:8 16:16-17:2 17:5-17:19 18:2-18:5 18:8-18:23 19:2-20:21 22:18-22:19 22:21-25:15 26:3-29:15 29:18-32:20 32:22-32:22 32:24-33:4 33:6-34:5 34:7-35:14 35:17-35:22 35:24-36:4 36:7-36:12 36:14-37:5 41:4-46:1 46:3-46:14 46:16-46:16 47:6-50:12 51:8-51:15 51:17-55:23 56:1-57:7 57:11-59:16 62:10-64:24 65:2-65:9 67:18-72:11 701, 602 602 611 602 602 602, 701 602 602, AA 602 602 602 602 602 602 602 602 602 602 602 602 602 602, 701 602 602 602 602 611 611 402, 611 -6CASE NO.6:05-CV-424 LED-JDL PLAINTIFF ADVANCEME, INC.'S OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANTS' AFFIRMATIVE DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS Case 6:05-cv-00424-LED Document 300 Filed 06/19/2007 Page 9 of 32 72:14-72:20 73:23-74:18 74:20-77:5 77:23-78:19 78:21-79:9 79:11-79:16 80:24-82:23 83:2-89:12 89:15-92:14 92:17-98:1 100:21-100:24 101:3-101:20 104:9-121:4 125:13-127:19 128:19-131:2 132:24-136:23 611 CS, 611 602, 106 602, 701 602, 701 602, 701, 106 N 611 611, 1001-1004 611, 402, 602 611 611 602, 701, 402 602 402 611, 602 PLAINTIFF ADVANCEME, INC.'S OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANTS' AFFIRMATIVE DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS -7- CASE NO.6:05-CV-424 LED-JDL Case 6:05-cv-00424-LED Document 300 Filed 06/19/2007 Page 10 of 32 DEPOSITION OF MICHELLE BOUDETTE, February 16, 2007 DEFENDANTS' DESIGNATED TESTIMONY ADVANCEME'S OBJECTIONS 14:4-14:13 16:4-17:10 17:16-18:2 18:15-20:8 20:20-22:10 22:19-22:24 23:13-24:1 24:3-25:19 25:21-28:5 30:14-32:10 33:1-36:17 36:19-36:20 36:22-39:1 39:17-40:16 41:11-41:21 42:6-42:22 46:2-46:3 46:22-47:5 49:13-54:21 54:24-58:4 61:4-61:16 65:14-67:13 68:9-73:15 75:20-78:22 80:4-81:1 85:12-90:10 99:15-99:20 102:4-103:5 105:22-106:8 106, IA, F F, 602, 611 F, 602, 611 F, 602, 611 801, F, 602, CS MC 106, IA, 602, F 106, F, 602 602, 801, F, AF, 106, CS, 611 801 801, 804, F, 602 106, IA 602, F, A, 1001-1004 602, F, A, 1001-1004 602, F, A, 1001-1004, MC 602, F 602, F, CS 602, F, CS 602, F, CS, IC, AA 106, AA, 611, 801 CS, 801 402, 403, IC F, 602, 611, CS, 402, 403 402, 403 CS, 402, 403 CQ, NR, 602, 611 602 611 602, F -8CASE NO.6:05-CV-424 LED-JDL PLAINTIFF ADVANCEME, INC.'S OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANTS' AFFIRMATIVE DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS Case 6:05-cv-00424-LED Document 300 Filed 06/19/2007 Page 11 of 32 DEPOSITION OF JOHN RANDALL BOURNE, January 26, 2007 DEFENDANTS' DESIGNATED TESTIMONY ADVANCEME'S OBJECTIONS 23:20-28:19 28:23-31:9 31:25-32:6 41:14-41:22 43:9-44:22 45:5-46:9 52:5-52:20 73:11-73:18 76:13-76:25 77:13-78:22 78:24-79:12 79:14-79:17 79:19-79:22 80:7-81:3 81:5-81:7 82:18-84:22 84:24-84:24 85:7-85:24 86:1-87:3 87:5-87:11 88:2-89:9 91:2-92:2 93:18-93:22 96:18-97:16 402 106 801, 1001-1004 1001-1002, 1004 602, 901, 1001-1002, 1004, CS 602, 801-804, 901, 1001-1002, 1004, CS 602, 801-804, 901, 1001-1002, 1004 402 602, 801-804, 901, 1001-1002, 1004, CS F, 602, 611 611 106, 611 106, 602 MC, 602, 611, F 106, 602, F 611, 1001-1004 106 AA, 611, CS, 602 CS, 602, 106, AA 106 402, 1001-1004 F, 602, 701 106, 402, 403 F, 602, 701, 801-804, 901, 1001-1002, 1004 PLAINTIFF ADVANCEME, INC.'S OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANTS' AFFIRMATIVE DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS -9- CASE NO.6:05-CV-424 LED-JDL Case 6:05-cv-00424-LED Document 300 Filed 06/19/2007 Page 12 of 32 DEPOSITION OF JENNIFER L. CARTER, February 27, 2007 DEFENDANTS' DESIGNATED TESTIMONY ADVANCEME'S OBJECTIONS 37:3-38:16 38:10-38:16 40:15-41:7 42:4-45:8 54:24-55:11 106, 402, 611, IQ, MC 106, MC, 611 402, MC, 611, 106 611, IQ, 602, 801, F, CS, MC, 402 NR, CQ, MC, 602, 701, E, 106, F, CS PLAINTIFF ADVANCEME, INC.'S OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANTS' AFFIRMATIVE DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS -10- CASE NO.6:05-CV-424 LED-JDL Case 6:05-cv-00424-LED Document 300 Filed 06/19/2007 Page 13 of 32 DEPOSITION OF RUTH ELASRI, February 22, 2007 DEFENDANTS' DESIGNATED TESTIMONY ADVANCEME'S OBJECTIONS 67:5-72:18 75:12-76:2 77:9-77:20 78:25-79:5 79:12-80:9 81:16-81:25 84:23-88:16 90:21-91:8 92:11-94:20 98:1-99:2 100:8-100:18 101:9-106:3 106:14-107:2 107:4-107:18 110:10-111:8 120:21-120:24 106, 611, 402 106, 402 106, 402, MC 106 602, F, CS 106, 402 106, 402 106, 402, OS 106, 402, MC, 611 106, 611, CQ 602, 701, E, F, CS 106, 402, 602, 701, E, F, CS, OS MC, 106, 402, 602, 701, E, F, CS, OS 106, 402, 602, 701, E, F, CS, OS 106, 402, 602, 701, E, F, CS, OS 106, 402, 602, 701, E, F, CS, OS PLAINTIFF ADVANCEME, INC.'S OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANTS' AFFIRMATIVE DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS -11- CASE NO.6:05-CV-424 LED-JDL Case 6:05-cv-00424-LED Document 300 Filed 06/19/2007 Page 14 of 32 DEPOSITION OF LES FALKE, March 2, 2007 1 DEFENDANTS' DESIGNATED TESTIMONY ADVANCEME'S OBJECTIONS 5:6-156:6 106, 403, 602, 611, 701, 901, A, AA, A/C, AF, AR, CQ, CS, F, IQ, MC The Defendants have designated several large portions of deposition testimony (some in excess of 100pages) without identifying the specific portions on which they intend to rely at trial. Because AdvanceMe should not bear the burden of identifying the relevant portions of Defendants' designations, AdvanceMe has objected to the entire designated section for each designation exceeding ten pages of testimony. PLAINTIFF ADVANCEME, INC.'S OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANTS' AFFIRMATIVE DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS CASE NO.6:05-CV-424 LED-JDL 1 -12- Case 6:05-cv-00424-LED Document 300 Filed 06/19/2007 Page 15 of 32 DEPOSITION OF JEANNETTE MAY GEPFORD, February 15, 2007 2 DEFENDANTS' DESIGNATED TESTIMONY ADVANCEME'S OBJECTIONS 4:23-10:5 10:17-26:17 28:14-44:5 52:22-54:3 63:5-74:16 801 611, 801, F, 602, AA, CS, IQ 602, 611, CQ, CS, F, IQ 402, 403 CQ, CS, 602, 611, 402, 801 The Defendants have designated several large portions of deposition testimony (some in excess of 100pages) without identifying the specific portions on which they intend to rely at trial. Because AdvanceMe should not bear the burden of identifying the relevant portions of Defendants' designations, AdvanceMe has objected to the entire designated section for each designation exceeding ten pages of testimony. PLAINTIFF ADVANCEME, INC.'S OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANTS' AFFIRMATIVE DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS 2 -13- CASE NO.6:05-CV-424 LED-JDL Case 6:05-cv-00424-LED Document 300 Filed 06/19/2007 Page 16 of 32 DEPOSITION OF CLIFFORD CHARLES HARDWICK DEFENDANTS' DESIGNATED TESTIMONY ADVANCEME'S OBJECTIONS 5:8-24:6 25:12-69:3 75:9-112:8 611, CQ, CS, AA, AF 611, F, 602, CS, AR, AA, CQ, 801, 802, AF, IQ, F, CS, 602, 801, 802, AA, 611, 403, IQ, 402, CQ PLAINTIFF ADVANCEME, INC.'S OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANTS' AFFIRMATIVE DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS -14- CASE NO.6:05-CV-424 LED-JDL Case 6:05-cv-00424-LED Document 300 Filed 06/19/2007 Page 17 of 32 DEPOSITION OF BARBARA JOHNSON, June 28, 2006 3 DEFENDANTS' DESIGNATED TESTIMONY ADVANCEME'S OBJECTIONS 14:2-15:21 17:8-17:23 18:16-20:14 21:14-26:25 74:18-81:24 84:8-99:3 102:5-115:14 117:14-118:12 120:5-144:7 157:20-158:20 165:3-183:23 191:4-214:8 217:2-233:22 235:3-239:4 258:18-259:11 264:11-271:12 276:15-277:4 280:17-281:18 AA, 611, 403 AA, 611, 403 402, 403, 611 402, AA, 403, 611 602, 611, 701, 1001-1004, 701, E, AA, 403, F, CS, A 1001-1004, 611, 701, E, AA, 403, 602, F, CS, A 701, E, 611, AA, 403 IA, 106, 403 1001-1004, 106, 701, IE (702), 611, AA, 403, MC, 602, F, CS, A 106 1001-1004, 701, E, 702, 611, AA, 403, F, CS, A 1001-1004, 701, 403, E, AA, A, 611, F, 602, CS, A 701, E, 611 701, E, 611 701, E, 611 106, 611 106 AA, 611, 403, 701, E The Defendants have designated several large portions of deposition testimony (some in excess of 100pages) without identifying the specific portions on which they intend to rely at trial. Because AdvanceMe should not bear the burden of identifying the relevant portions of Defendants' designations, AdvanceMe has objected to the entire designated section for each designation exceeding ten pages of testimony. PLAINTIFF ADVANCEME, INC.'S OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANTS' AFFIRMATIVE DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS 3 -15- CASE NO.6:05-CV-424 LED-JDL Case 6:05-cv-00424-LED Document 300 Filed 06/19/2007 Page 18 of 32 DEPOSITION OF GARY JOHNSON DEFENDANTS' DESIGNATED TESTIMONY ADVANCEME'S OBJECTIONS 4:13-39:7 41:5-43:24 47:22-56:10 56:23-72:15 F, CQ, 611, MC, 403, 701, CS 402, CS F, AA, CS 611, CS, F, AA PLAINTIFF ADVANCEME, INC.'S OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANTS' AFFIRMATIVE DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS -16- CASE NO.6:05-CV-424 LED-JDL Case 6:05-cv-00424-LED Document 300 Filed 06/19/2007 Page 19 of 32 DEPOSITION OF JOHN KONOP, February 8, 2007 DEFENDANTS' DESIGNATED TESTIMONY ADVANCEME'S OBJECTIONS 152:3-153:6 154:1-155:17 158:23-161:12 162:1-21 163:24-166:17 167:13-168:25 170:4-173:2 176:19-178:8 182:9-183:15 184:2-11 185:11-189:25 191:18-194:12 194:23-195:6 203:21-205:4 207:7-214:25 231:18-232:12 234:23-237:8 262:8-263:5 267:10-24 298:16-299:3 317:19-320:21 322:20-324:11 324:23-326:21 328:23-329:13 330:22-331:8 106, 402, 602, 701, 801, 1001-1004, CS, E, F, IA 106, 402, 602, 701, 801, 1001-1004, CS, E, F, IA, 611, CQ 106, 402, 701, 801, 1001-1004, CS, E, IA, 403, 602, F 106, 402, 801, 1001-1004, IA 106, 402, 602, 701, 801, 1001-1004, AF, CS, F, IA 106, 402, 602, 701, 801, AF, CS, E, F, IA 106, 402, 602, 701, 801, A, AF, CS, 1001-1004, F, 611 106, 402, 602, 701, 801, AF, 1001-1004, CS, F 106, 402, 602, 701, 801, AF, 1001-1004, CS, F 106, 402, 602, 701, 801, 1001-1004, CS, F 106, 402, 602, 701, 801, 1001-1004, CS, F 106, 402, 801, 1001-1004, IA 106, 801, 1001-1004, F, IA, Y, 602, CS 106, 611, 801, CS, F, 602 106, 611 106, 611, CS, F, 602, 701, E 106, 611 106, 611, CS, F, 602, 701, E 106, 611 106, 611 106, 611 106, IC, 611 106, IC, 611 106, 402, 701, 801, A/C, CS, E, F, IA, 611 106, 402, 701, 801, AA, AF, CS, E, F, 611 PLAINTIFF ADVANCEME, INC.'S OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANTS' AFFIRMATIVE DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS -17- CASE NO.6:05-CV-424 LED-JDL Case 6:05-cv-00424-LED Document 300 Filed 06/19/2007 Page 20 of 32 DEPOSITION OF EDWARD W. LANDON, February 14, 2007 4 DEFENDANTS' DESIGNATED TESTIMONY ADVANCEME'S OBJECTIONS 5:19-18:23 19:13-44:2 44:10-50:22 68:19-69:23 70:23-71:7 602, CS, F 602, CS, F, 701, IE (702), MC, 611, 1001-1004 602, CS, F, AA, MC, 611 AA AA, 602, CS, F The Defendants have designated several large portions of deposition testimony (some in excess of 100pages) without identifying the specific portions on which they intend to rely at trial. Because AdvanceMe should not bear the burden of identifying the relevant portions of Defendants' designations, AdvanceMe has objected to the entire designated section for each designation exceeding ten pages of testimony. PLAINTIFF ADVANCEME, INC.'S OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANTS' AFFIRMATIVE DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS 4 -18- CASE NO.6:05-CV-424 LED-JDL Case 6:05-cv-00424-LED Document 300 Filed 06/19/2007 Page 21 of 32 DEPOSITION OF THOMAS J. LITLE IV, September 6. 2006 DEFENDANTS' DESIGNATED TESTIMONY ADVANCEME'S OBJECTIONS 22:13-27:25 28:13-28:19 28:22-34:8 35:13-36:7 38:9-39:10 46:7-49:15 49:25-55:3 56:21-57:3 57:9-63:2 66:22-67:18 67:21-67:22 67:25-70:9 70:14-72:17 72:21-73:13 73:16-74:3 74:12-75:5 75:8-76:16 76:19-82:9 82:12-83:2 83:7-83:13 83:16-88:24 89:1-92:20 93:3-99:1 99:17-110:11 110:13-113:10 114:11-114:22 114:24-115:25 152:19-152:21 152:23-155:18 402, 403, 602, 611, F 602, 611, 701, 702, E 602, 611, 701, 702 602, 701, 702 602, 701, 702 402, 602, 611 602 106, 611 402, 403, 801-804 106, 602, 611, 901, 1000-1004, 1007 106, 602, 611, 901, 1000-1004 106, 602, 611, 901, 1000-1004, 1007 602, 611, 901, 1000-1004, 1007, CS 106, 611 106, 611 106, 611 106, 602, 611 611 602, 701, CS, F 602, 801, CS 602, 611, 901, 1000-1004, 1007, CS 602, 1000-1004 602, 701, 702, 801-804, 901, 1000-1004 402, 403, 602, 611, 1000-1004, CS 106, 403, B 611, 701, F 611, 701, F 602, 611, 701, 702, 1000-1004, CS 602, 611, 701, 702, 1000-1004, CS -19CASE NO.6:05-CV-424 LED-JDL PLAINTIFF ADVANCEME, INC.'S OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANTS' AFFIRMATIVE DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS Case 6:05-cv-00424-LED Document 300 Filed 06/19/2007 Page 22 of 32 DEFENDANTS' DESIGNATED TESTIMONY ADVANCEME'S OBJECTIONS 155:21-155:24 156:4-158:9 289:15-290:3 290:6-290:11 290:15-290:15 602, 611, 701, 702, 1000-1004, CS 602, 611, 701, 702, 1000-1004, CS 602, 611 602, 611 602, 611 PLAINTIFF ADVANCEME, INC.'S OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANTS' AFFIRMATIVE DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS -20- CASE NO.6:05-CV-424 LED-JDL Case 6:05-cv-00424-LED Document 300 Filed 06/19/2007 Page 23 of 32 DEPOSITION OF NICK LOGAN, March 1, 2007 DEFENDANTS' DESIGNATED TESTIMONY ADVANCEME'S OBJECTIONS 6:11-55:7 56:26-62:12 74:10-75:16 801, 802, 602, AA, 611, CS 402, CS, 602, 611 402 PLAINTIFF ADVANCEME, INC.'S OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANTS' AFFIRMATIVE DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS -21- CASE NO.6:05-CV-424 LED-JDL Case 6:05-cv-00424-LED Document 300 Filed 06/19/2007 Page 24 of 32 DEPOSITION OF DANIAL LOTT, February 16, 2007 DEFENDANTS' DESIGNATED TESTIMONY ADVANCEME'S OBJECTIONS 88:20-89:23 89:5-89:23 90:19-91:22 92:9-94:3 101:19-103:18 115:9-115:17 611 611 611, CQ, CS 611 F, CS F, CS PLAINTIFF ADVANCEME, INC.'S OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANTS' AFFIRMATIVE DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS -22- CASE NO.6:05-CV-424 LED-JDL Case 6:05-cv-00424-LED Document 300 Filed 06/19/2007 Page 25 of 32 DEPOSITION OF ANTHONY S. MALEY, February 28, 2007 DEFENDANTS' DESIGNATED TESTIMONY ADVANCEME'S OBJECTIONS 57:17-59:14 66:24-67:9 OS NR PLAINTIFF ADVANCEME, INC.'S OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANTS' AFFIRMATIVE DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS -23- CASE NO.6:05-CV-424 LED-JDL Case 6:05-cv-00424-LED Document 300 Filed 06/19/2007 Page 26 of 32 DEPOSITION OF TOM MCBREARTY, February 13, 2007 DEFENDANTS' DESIGNATED TESTIMONY ADVANCEME'S OBJECTIONS 15:23-18:24 19:4-22:23 24:12-28:6 28:17-33:3 36:18-43:19 44:12-46:18 48:7-48:19 49:5-49:12 51:21-58:21 59:12-69:6 75:25-78:4 78:14-83:5 93:3-93:16 94:17-94:25 95:15-96:16 117:1-120:11 122:7-123:6 602, CS, F CQ CQ, 611, CS 611, 602, CS, F, 1001-1004 602, CS, F, IQ, MC, 701, IE (702), E MC, 602, F, CS, 611, 1001-1004 106, 602, CS, F, 611, 1001-1004 602, CS, F, 1001-1004 611, 602, CS, F, 1001-1004 602, CS, F 602, CS, F, CQ, 701, IE (702), E 602, F, CS, 701, IE (702), E, AA, IA, 611 CQ 106, IA 611, MC 611, AA, MC 602, F, CS PLAINTIFF ADVANCEME, INC.'S OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANTS' AFFIRMATIVE DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS -24- CASE NO.6:05-CV-424 LED-JDL Case 6:05-cv-00424-LED Document 300 Filed 06/19/2007 Page 27 of 32 DEPOSITION OF WILLIAM MORGENSTEIN, February 20, 2007 5 DEFENDANTS' DESIGNATED TESTIMONY ADVANCEME'S OBJECTIONS 7:25-11:21 13:2-14:25 15:13-18:18 18:22-20:16 24:13-36:1 36:21-38:5 38:17-40:18 43:10-44:17 45:25-46:11 46:21-52:21 53:7-53:9 54:25-55:6 59:8-61:18 65:11-65:13 67:13-68:6 79:22-80:6 94:3-94:9 95:14-98:12 402 402, F, 611, 602 801, 802 402 B, 402, 611, 602, 801, 802, F, CS F, CS, 602 402, A F, 602, CS, A 801, 802 F, 602, 611, IC, CS 106 F, 602, CS 402, B F, 602, CS A, CS, F, 602 AA, F, CS, 602 NR F, 602, CS, AA, IC, MC The Defendants have designated several large portions of deposition testimony (some in excess of 100pages) without identifying the specific portions on which they intend to rely at trial. Because AdvanceMe should not bear the burden of identifying the relevant portions of Defendants' designations, AdvanceMe has objected to the entire designated section for each designation exceeding ten pages of testimony. PLAINTIFF ADVANCEME, INC.'S OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANTS' AFFIRMATIVE DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS 5 -25- CASE NO.6:05-CV-424 LED-JDL Case 6:05-cv-00424-LED Document 300 Filed 06/19/2007 Page 28 of 32 DEPOSITION OF ADAM SECHER, January 30, 2007 DEFENDANTS' DESIGNATED TESTIMONY ADVANCEME'S OBJECTIONS 8:8-10:1 13:10-19:20 27:6-27:19 31:9-32:17 40:20-41:9 47:4-47:24 51:5-51:20 55:2-56:23 59:2-60:11 64:13-65:6 IQ 602, F, CS 106, AA 602, F, CS 611, MC 611 IQ, 602, F, CS 611 611, IQ, 602, F, CS 106, IQ, IA, 611, 402 PLAINTIFF ADVANCEME, INC.'S OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANTS' AFFIRMATIVE DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS -26- CASE NO.6:05-CV-424 LED-JDL Case 6:05-cv-00424-LED Document 300 Filed 06/19/2007 Page 29 of 32 DEPOSITION OF GERETTE SORWELL, February 14, 2007 6 DEFENDANTS' DESIGNATED TESTIMONY ADVANCEME'S OBJECTIONS 6:8-11:6 13:15-16:21 17:10-28:24 30:10-31:24 36:16-43:18 45:1-47:7 47:17-51:4 611 611 602, CS, F 611 602, CS, F 602, CS, F AA The Defendants have designated several large portions of deposition testimony (some in excess of 100pages) without identifying the specific portions on which they intend to rely at trial. Because AdvanceMe should not bear the burden of identifying the relevant portions of Defendants' designations, AdvanceMe has objected to the entire designated section for each designation exceeding ten pages of testimony. PLAINTIFF ADVANCEME, INC.'S OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANTS' AFFIRMATIVE DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS 6 -27- CASE NO.6:05-CV-424 LED-JDL Case 6:05-cv-00424-LED Document 300 Filed 06/19/2007 Page 30 of 32 DEPOSITION OF LEE SUCKOW, October 4, 2006 7 DEFENDANTS' DESIGNATED TESTIMONY ADVANCEME'S OBJECTIONS 5:18-63:3 69:22-71:5 74:12-82:15 83:3-88:22 134:3-139:10 IQ 602, F, CS, 801 611 611 IQ The Defendants have designated several large portions of deposition testimony (some in excess of 100pages) without identifying the specific portions on which they intend to rely at trial. Because AdvanceMe should not bear the burden of identifying the relevant portions of Defendants' designations, AdvanceMe has objected to the entire designated section for each designation exceeding ten pages of testimony. PLAINTIFF ADVANCEME, INC.'S OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANTS' AFFIRMATIVE DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS 7 -28- CASE NO.6:05-CV-424 LED-JDL Case 6:05-cv-00424-LED Document 300 Filed 06/19/2007 Page 31 of 32 DEPOSITION OF ANTHONY LEROY WILDEN, February 20, 2007 DEFENDANTS' DESIGNATED TESTIMONY ADVANCEME'S OBJECTIONS 11:13-11:21 41:8-42:23 52:8-54:8 Dated: June 19, 2007 801 602, 801 611 Respectfully submitted, By: /s/ Vidya R. Bhakar PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER LLP Ronald S. Lemieux (ronlemieux@paulhastings.com) (CA Bar No. 120822) (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) Michael N. Edelman (michaeledelman@paulhastings.com) (CA Bar No. 180948) (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) Vidya R. Bhakar (vidbhakar@paulhastings.com) (CA Bar No. 220210) (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) Robert C. Matz (robertmatz@paulhastings.com) (CA Bar No. 217822) (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) Shanée Y. Williams (shaneewilliams@paulhastings.com) (CA Bar No. 221310) (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) Five Palo Alto Square, Sixth Floor Palo Alto, CA 94306-2155 Telephone: (650) 320-1800 Telecopier: (650) 320-1900 IRELAND, CARROLL & KELLEY, P.C. Otis W. Carroll, Attorney-in-Charge State Bar No. 03895700 Deborah Race State Bar No. 16448700 6101 South Broadway, Suite 500 Tyler, TX 75703 Telephone: 903-561-1600 Facsimile: 903-581-1071 Email: fedserv@icklaw.com ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF ADVANCEME, INC. PLAINTIFF ADVANCEME, INC.'S OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANTS' AFFIRMATIVE DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS -29- CASE NO.6:05-CV-424 LED-JDL Case 6:05-cv-00424-LED Document 300 Filed 06/19/2007 Page 32 of 32 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that all counsel of record who have consented to electronic service are being served a copy of this document via the court's CM/ECF system pursuant to Local Rule CV-5(a)(3) on this the 19th day of June, 2007. Any other counsel of record will be served by first class mail on this same date. By. /s/ Vidya R. Bhakar Vidya R. Bhakar LEGAL_US_W # 56498081.1 PLAINTIFF ADVANCEME, INC.'S OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANTS' AFFIRMATIVE DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS -30- CASE NO.6:05-CV-424 LED-JDL

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?