AdvanceMe Inc v. RapidPay LLC

Filing 323

Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Leonard Davis : Bench Trial (DAY 1) held on 7/16/2007. Trial to resume at 9:00 am on 7/17/2007. (Court Reporters: Therese Casterline & Jana Bald [Sunbelt Reporting].) (rlf) Modified on 7/18/2007 to correct appearance of Counsel Sanders (rlf).

Download PDF
AdvanceMe Inc v. RapidPay LLC Doc. 323 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION DATE: July 16, 2007 JUDGE LEONARD DAVIS L A W CLERKS: Andrea Houston, Nicole Mitchell COURT REPORTERS: Therese Casterline & Jana Bald AdvanceMe, Inc. Plaintiff vs. Capital Business Corporation, et al Defendants ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFFS Ronald Lemieux (Paul Hastings) Michael Edelman (Paul Hastings) Robert Matz (Paul Hastings) Shanee Williams (Paul Hastings) Vid Bhakar (Paul Hastings) Otis Carroll (ICK Firm) Deborah Race (ICK Firm) Parris Sanz - In House Counsel Glen Goldman - CEO CIVIL ACTION NO: 6:05-CV-424 BENCH TRIAL DAY 1 ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANT Jeff Sanders (Roberts & Ritholz) Brian Buss (V&E) Joseph Gray (V&E) Willem Schuurman (V&E) Doug McSwane (Potter Minton) Matt Rowan (Potter Minton) For Merchant & Reach On this day, came the parties by their attorneys and the following proceedings were had: OPEN: 10:15 am TIME: 10:15 am MINUTES: Court Reporter sworn. Case called. Mr. Carroll announces counsel for the plaintiff. Mr. McSwane announces counsel for the defendants. Court asked for witnesses who are present to be sworn. Witnesses sworn. Mr. Lemieux presented opening statement to the Court. Mr. Schuurman presented opening statement to the Court. ADJOURN: 4:53 pm 10:20 am 10:50 am DAVID J. MALAND, CLERK FILED: 7.16.2007 B Y : Rosa L. Ferguson, Courtroom Deputy Dockets.Justia.com PAGE 2 - Proceedings Continued TIME: 11:27 am MINUTES: Plaintiff offers exhibits 1 - 1983 as listed on final trial exhibit list, but if counted there are only 335 total exhibits. Plaintiff's Exhibits 1-4, 7, 8, 14 - 53, 55 - 65, 182 - 216, 218 - 256, 267 - 281, 303 - 451, 483 - 504, 507 - 519, 521, 525, 1977 - 1983 admitted (AS REFLECTED ON EXHIBIT LIST). Defendant offers exhibits 1 388, except the ones with an objection. Those exhibits admitted except those marked with an "X" under objection. This is a total of 399 exhibits. Defendants' Exhibits 1-6, 12-23, 26, 29, 31, 37, 40, 41 - 44, 53 - 56, 61, 62, 68, 72, 74, 76, 78, 82, 85 - 89, 92, - 94, 96, 98, 102 - 106, 109, 124, 136 - 149, 151, 152, 155 - 199, 202, 204 - 207, 209 - 212, 215, 216, 218 - 221, 223 - 231, 257 - 297, 309, 310, 314, 319 - 330, 333 387, 389 - 399, AND, 11, 28, 45, 46 - 52, 58 - 60, 63, 64, 69 - 71, 73, 75, 77, 79 - 81, 83, 84, 91, 95, 97, 107, 108, 110 - 116, 150, 153, 154, 200, 201, 203, 208, 213, 214, 217, 222, 232 - 256, 311 - 313, 315 - 318, 388 admitted (AS REFLECTED ON EXHIBIT LIST). Trial resumes. Plaintiff calls BARBARA JOHNSON to the stand. Witness previously sworn. Direct examination of Ms. Johnson by Mr. Lemieux. Cross examination of Ms. Johnson by Mr. Schuurman. Redirect examination of Ms. Johnson by Mr. Lemieux. Recross examination of Ms. Johnson by Mr. Schuurman. The Court examined the witness. Court excused Ms. Johnson from the stand. Plaintiff calls LES FALKE to the stand. Witness previously sworn. Direct examination of Mr. Falke by Mr. Edelman. Mr. Schuurman will call witness in their case in chief and will reserve examination until that time. Mr. Falke excused. Plaintiff calls MICHAEL I. SHAMOS, PhD to the stand. Witness previously sworn. Direct examination of Dr. Shamos by Mr. Edelman. Court in recess. Trial resumes. Cross examination of Dr. Shamos by Mr. Buss. Cross examination of Dr. Shamos by Mr. Gray. No further questions of the witness. Dr. Shamos excused. Court addressed the litigants and audience. Court in recess until 9:00 am tomorrow. 1:00 pm 1:00 pm 1:13 pm 1:25 pm 1:30 pm 1:30 pm 1:32 pm 1:32 pm 1:55 pm 1:55 pm 1:55 pm 3:47 pm 4:00 pm 4:00 pm 4:23 pm 4:50 pm 4:53 pm

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?