AdvanceMe Inc v. RapidPay LLC

Filing 49

ORDER granting 35 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re 23 Amended Complaint, It is therefore ORDERED that Defendant Capital Business Corporation shall have to and including May 4, 2006 to respond to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint . Signed by Judge John D. Love on 4/25/06. (fnt, ) Modified on 4/25/2006 (fnt, ).

Casese 6:05-cv-00424-LED Document 4935 Filed 04/25/2006 Page 1 of of 1 Ca 6:05-cv-00424-LED-JDL Document Filed 04/24/2006 Page 1 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

ADVANCEME, INC., Plaintiff, vs. RAPIDPAY LLC, BUSINESS CAPITAL CORPORATION, FIRST FUNDS LLC, MERCHANT MONEY TREE, INC., REACH FINANCIAL, LLC and FAST TRANSACT, INC. dba SIMPLE CASH Defendants

CASE NO. 6: 05-CV-424 LED

NO JURY REQUESTED ­ EQUITABLE RELIEF ONLY

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND Before the Court is an Agreed Motion to Extend Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond for Defendant Capital Business Corporation to respond to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint to and including May 4, 2006. The Court, having considered the motion, finds . that it is well taken and should be GRANTED. It is therefore ORDERED that Defendant Capital Business Corporation shall have to and including May 4, 2006 to respond to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint.
So ORDERED and SIGNED this 25th day of April, 2006.

___________________________________ JOHN D. LOVE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE