AdvanceMe Inc v. RapidPay LLC

Filing 52

ORDER granting 51 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re 23 Amended Complaint, Dft, Capital Business Corporation shall have to and including May 15, 2006 to respond to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge John D. Love on 5/5/06. (fnt, )

Download PDF
Casase 6:05-cv-00424-LED Document 5251 Filed 05/05/2006 Page 1 of of 1 Ce 6:05-cv-00424-LED-JDL Document Filed 05/04/2006 Page 1 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION ADVANCEME, INC., CASE NO. 6: 05-CV-424 LED Plaintiff, vs. BUSINESS CAPITAL CORPORATION, FIRST FUNDS LLC, MERCHANT MONEY TREE, INC., REACH FINANCIAL, LLC and FAST TRANSACT, INC. dba SIMPLE CASH RAPIDPAY LLC, NO JURY REQUESTED ­ EQUITABLE RELIEF ONLY Defendants ORDER GRANTING SECOND MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND Before the Court is an Agreed Motion to Extend Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond for Defendant Capital Business Corporation to respond to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint to and including May 15, 2006. The Court, having considered the motion, finds that it is well taken and should be GRANTED. . It is therefore ORDERED that Defendant Capital Business Corporation shall have to and including May 15, 2006 to respond to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint. So ORDERED and SIGNED this 5th day of May, 2006. ___________________________________ JOHN D. LOVE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?