AdvanceMe Inc v. RapidPay LLC
Filing
69
NOTICE of Disclosure by AdvanceMe Inc (Carroll, Otis)
AdvanceMe Inc v. RapidPay LLC
Doc. 69
Case 6:05-cv-00424-LED
Document 69
Filed 06/27/2006
Page 1 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION ADVANCEME, INC. § § VS. § § RAPDIPAY, LLC, BUSINESS CAPITAL § CORPORATION, FIRST FUNDS, LLC, § MERCHANT MONEY TREE, INC., § REACH FINANCIAL, LLC and FAST § TRANSACT, INC., dba SIMPLE CASH § Civil Case No. 6:05-CV-424 LED NO JURY REQUESTED EQUITABLE RELIEF ONLY
NOTICE OF INITIAL DISCLOSURES Pursuant to the Discovery Order entered on February 24, 2006, and the Amended Docket Control Order entered on June 2, 2006, Plaintiff AdvanceMe, Inc. certifies that it has furnished all parties of record with its Initial Disclosure on June 12, 2006. Dated: June 27, 2006 Respectfully submitted, /s/ Otis Carroll Otis Carroll Texas State Bar No. 03895700 Deborah Race Texas State Bar No. 16448700 IRELAND, CARROLL & KELLEY, P.C 6101 S. Broadway, Suite 500 Tyler, Texas 75703 Tel: (903) 561-1600 Fax: (903) 581-1071 Email: Fedserv@icklaw.com OF COUNSEL: Ronald S. Lemieux Daniel B. Pollack PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER, LLP Five Palo Alto Square, Sixth Floor Palo Alto, CA 94306-2155 Tel: (650) 320-1800 Fax: (650) 320-1900
Dockets.Justia.com
Case 6:05-cv-00424-LED
Document 69
Filed 06/27/2006
Page 2 of 2
Elizabeth L. Brann 3579 Valley Centre Drive San Diego, CA 92130 Tel: (858) 720-2500 Fax: (858) 720-2555 ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF ADVANCEME, INC.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned hereby certifies that all counsel of record who are deemed to have consented to electronic service are being served with a copy of this document via the Court's CM/ECF system per Local Rule CV-5(a)(3). Any other counsel of record or parties will be served by facsimile transmission and/or first class mail this 27th day of June, 2006. /s/Otis Carroll
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?