AdvanceMe Inc v. RapidPay LLC
Filing
9
ORDER granting 8 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re 5 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction in the Alternative Motion to Transfer Venue and Original Answer Subject Thereto ; Replies due by 12/28/2005. Signed by Judge Leonard Davis on 12/21/05. cc:attys 12-21-05 (mll, )
<![CDATA[
Case 6:05-cv-00424-LED
Document 8 9
Filed 12/19/2005 12/21/2005
Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION ADVANCEME, INC. Plaintiff § § § § § § § § § §
CASE NO.. 6:05CV 424 LED
vs. RAPIDPAY, LLCSM Defendant.
NO JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
ORDER This Court, having considered the Unopposed Motion to Defendant, Rapidpay, LLC to file its Sur-Reply to Plaintiff, Advanceme, Inc.'s Response to Motion to Dismiss and In the Alternative, Motion to Transfer, and such motion being unopposed, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant, Rapidpay, LLC, shall answer or otherwise file its Sur-Reply to Plaintiff, Advanceme, Inc.'s Response to Motion to Dismiss and In the Alternative, Motion to Transfer on or before December 28, 2005.
So ORDERED and SIGNED this 21st day of December, 2005.
__________________________________ LEONARD DAVIS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
