Mirror Worlds, LLC v. Apple, Inc.

Filing 148

ORDER granting #147 Motion for Extension of Time. Signed by Judge Leonard Davis on 11/30/09. cc:attys 11-30-09 (mll, )

Download PDF
Mirror Worlds, LLC v. Apple, Inc. Doc. 148 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION MIRROR WORLDS, LLC Plaintiff, JURY TRIAL DEMANDED v. APPLE, INC. Defendant. APPLE, INC. Counterclaim Plaintiff v. MIRROR WORLDS, LLC, MIRROR WORLDS TECHNOLOGIES, INC. Counterclaim Defendants. ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO EXTEND DEADLINES FOR THE PARTIES TO COMPLY WITH P.R. 4-3(d), 4-4, 4-5(a), 4-5(b) AND TO FILE ANY MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF INDEFINITENESS The Court, having considered Mirror Worlds, LLC's, Mirror Worlds Technologies, Inc.'s, and Apple Inc.'s Joint Motion For Extension of Time for the parties to comply with Local Patent Rules 4-3(d), 4-4, 4-5(a), 4-5(b), and to extend the deadline to file any motions for summary judgment of indefiniteness, finds the Motion should be granted. Civil Action No. 6:08-CV-88 LED -1Dockets.Justia.com IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that (a) the deadline to comply with Patent Local Rule 4-3(d) is extended to Friday, November 27, 2009, (b) the discovery deadline for claim construction issues under P.R. 4-4 is extended to Monday, December 21, 2009, for the limited purpose of completing the depositions of the parties' experts regarding claim construction, (c) the deadline to comply with Patent Local Rule 4-5(a) is extended to Monday, December 7, 2009, (d) the deadline to comply with Patent Local Rule 45(b) is extended to Tuesday, December 22, 2009, and (e) the deadline to file any motions for summary judgment of indefiniteness is extended to Tuesday, December 22, 2009. So ORDERED and SIGNED this 30th day of November, 2009. __________________________________ LEONARD DAVIS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?